Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36068443›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

High RIG-I and EFTUD2 expression predicts poor survival in endometrial cancer.

Susanne Beyer, Lena Müller, Sophie Mitter, Lucia Keilmann, Sarah Meister, Christina Buschmann, Fabian Kraus, Nicole E Topalov, Bastian Czogalla, Fabian Trillsch and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Prognostic biomarkers based onTranslational cancer research · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Susanne BeyerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lena MüllerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sophie MitterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lucia KeilmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sarah MeisterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christina BuschmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fabian KrausDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nicole E TopalovDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bastian CzogallaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fabian TrillschDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander BurgesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sven MahnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Elisa SchmoeckelInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sanja LöbDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation‑Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Mirjana KesslerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Udo JeschkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. Udo.Jeschke@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Thomas KolbenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELMU Klinikum · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEndometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy. The helicase RIG-I, a part of the innate immune system, and EFTUD2, a splicing factor which can upregulate RIG-I expression, are shown to influence tumor growth and disease progression in several malignancies. For endometrial cancer, an immunogenic cancer, data about RIG-I and EFTUD2 are still missing. The aim of this study was to examine the expression of RIG-I and EFTUD2 in endometrial cancer.

methods225 specimen of endometrial cancer were immunohistochemically stained for RIG-I and EFTUD2. The results were correlated to clinicopathological data, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsHigh RIG-I expression correlated with advanced tumor stages (FIGO: p = 0.027; pT: p = 0.010) and worse survival rates (OS: p = 0.009; PFS: p = 0.022). High EFTUD2 expression correlated to worse survival rates (OS: p = 0.026; PFS: p < 0.001) and was determined to be an independent marker for progression-free survival.

conclusionOur data suggest that the expression of RIG-I and EFTUD2 correlates with survival data, which makes both a possible therapeutic target in the future.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingPeptide Elongation FactorsPrognosisRibonucleoprotein, U5 Small NuclearEFTUD2 protein, humanPeptide Elongation FactorsRibonucleoprotein, U5 Small NuclearDDX58EFTUD 2Endometrial cancerInnate immune systemRIG-ISurvival

Identifiers

PMID36068443
PMCPMC10349715
OpenAlexW4294845518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.