Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36068362›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023

Pregnancy outcome and risk of recurrence after tissue-preserving loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).

Jule Alena Lieb, Anne Mondal, Lenard Lieb, Tanja Natascha Fehm, Monika Hampl

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jule Alena LiebClinic of Internal Medicine, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oberhausen, Oberhausen, Germany.
Anne MondalDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lenard LiebSchool of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Tanja Natascha FehmDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Monika HamplDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. hampl@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5949-5891
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Oberhausen · DEMaastricht School of Management · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purposeThis study aims to investigate whether women with cervical dysplasia after LEEP have an increased risk of pregnancy/childbirth complications or recurrence of dysplasia in an upcoming pregnancy.

methodsData from 240 women after LEEP were analysed retrospectively. The reference group consisted of 956 singleton births. Fisher's and Wilcoxon rank tests were used to detect differences between groups. Using logistic regressions, we analysed the effect of surgery-specific aspects of LEEP on pregnancy/childbirth complications and the frequency of CIN recurrences.

resultsWe found that tissue-preserving LEEP did not lead to premature birth or miscarriage and did not increase the likelihood of CIN recurrence. We did not observe differences regarding preterm birth [< 37 (p < 0.28) < 34 (p < 0.31), < 32 weeks of gestation (p < 0.11)] or birth weight (< 2500 g (p < 0.54), < 2000 g (p < 0.77) between groups. However, women after LEEP exhibit a higher risk of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term (p < 0.009) and vaginal infections (p < 0.06). Neither volume nor depth of the removed tissue nor an additional endocervical resection seems to influence the likelihood of premature birth or early miscarriage. Performing an endocervical resection protects against CIN recurrence (OR 0.0881, p < 0.003).

conclusionsAfter tissue-preserving LEEP, there is an increased risk of vaginal infections and PROM at term in consecutive pregnancy. LEEP does not affect prematurity or miscarriage. The removal of additional endocervical tissue appears to be a protective factor against recurrence of CIN.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousPremature BirthUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsElectrosurgeryFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesCervical intraepithelial dysplasiaConisationLEEPPregnancy outcomePremature rupture of membranesPreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID36068362
PMCPMC10023759
OpenAlexW4294845337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read106
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.