Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36068283›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Highly sensitive characterization of non-human glycan structures of monoclonal antibody drugs utilizing tandem mass spectrometry.

Yi-Min She, Shaojun Dai, Roger Y Tam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yi-Min SheCentre for Biologics Evaluation, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada. yi-min.she@hc-sc.gc.ca.
Shaojun DaiDevelopment Center of Plant Germplasm Resources, College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Roger Y TamCentre for Biologics Evaluation, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada. roger.tam@hc-sc.gc.ca.
Health Canada · CAShanghai Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glycosylation is an important attribute of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for assessing manufacturing quality. Analysis of non-human glycans containing terminal galactose-α1,3-galactose and N-glycolylneuraminic acid is essential due to the potential immunogenicity and insufficient efficacy caused by mAb expression in non-human mammalian cells. Using parallel sequencing of isobaric glycopeptides and isomeric glycans that were separated by reversed-phase and porous graphitic carbon LC, we report a highly sensitive LC MS/MS method for the comprehensive characterization of low-abundance non-human glycans and their closely related structural isomers. We demonstrate that the straightforward use of high-abundance diagnostic ions and complementary fragments under the positive ionization low-energy collision-induced dissociation is a universal approach to rapidly discriminate branch-linkage structures of biantennary glycans. Our findings reveal the structural diversity of non-human glycans and sulfation of α-galactosylated glycans, providing both an analytical method and candidate structures that could potentially be used in the crucial quality control of therapeutic mAb products.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalTandem Mass SpectrometryAnimalsChromatography, LiquidGalactoseMammalsPolysaccharidesAntibodies, MonoclonalGalactosePolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID36068283
PMCPMC9448817
OpenAlexW4294739457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.