Observational studyScientific reports2022
Improved evaluation of left ventricular hypertrophy using the spatial QRS-T angle by electrocardiography.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Within a Heartbeat: A Machine Learning Approach Using VCG for Heart Failure Assessment in Sinus Rhythm.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Accuracy and Prognosis of Electrocardiographic and Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Brazilian Adults - ELSA-Brasil Study.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2026Article
- Development and temporal validation of a two-stage ECG-based machine learning model for LVEF screening: a Middle Eastern cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Accelerated DNA methylation age plays a role in the impact of cardiovascular risk factors on the human heart.Clinical epigenetics · 2023Article
- Left ventricular hypertrophy detection using electrocardiographic signal.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrocardiographic (ECG) signs of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) lack sensitivity. The aim was to identify LVH based on an abnormal spatial peaks QRS-T angle, evaluate its diagnostic performance compared to conventional ECG criteria for LVH, and its prognostic performance. This was an observational study with four cohorts with a QRS duration < 120 ms. Based on healthy volunteers (n = 921), an abnormal spatial peaks QRS-T angle was defined as ≥ 40° for females and ≥ 55° for males. In other healthy volunteers (n = 461), the specificity of the QRS-T angle to detect LVH was 96% (females) and 98% (males). In patients with at least moderate LVH by cardiac imaging (n = 225), the QRS-T angle had a higher sensitivity than conventional ECG criteria (93-97% vs 13-56%, p < 0.001 for all). In clinical consecutive patients (n = 783), of those who did not have any LVH, 238/556 (43%) had an abnormal QRS-T angle. There was an association with hospitalization for heart failure or all-cause death in univariable and multivariable analysis. An abnormal QRS-T angle rarely occurred in healthy volunteers, was a mainstay of moderate or greater LVH, was common in clinical patients without LVH but with cardiac co-morbidities, and associated with outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.