Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36068108›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

People's perspectives about COVID-19 vaccination certificate: Findings from a representative Italian sample.

Marta Caserotti, Teresa Gavaruzzi, Paolo Girardi, Roberta Sellaro, Enrico Rubaltelli, Alessandra Tasso, Lorella Lotto

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta CaserottiDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy. Electronic address: marta.caserotti@unipd.it.
Teresa GavaruzziDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy. Electronic address: teresa.gavaruzzi@unipd.it.
Paolo GirardiDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy; Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Via Cesare Battisti 241, 35121 Padova, Italy. Electronic address: paolo.girardi@unipd.it.
Roberta SellaroDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy. Electronic address: roberta.sellaro@unipd.it.
Enrico RubaltelliDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy. Electronic address: enrico.rubaltelli@unipd.it.
Alessandra TassoDepartment of Humanities, University of Ferrara, Via Paradiso 12, 44121 Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: alessandra.tasso@unife.it.
Lorella LottoDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy. Electronic address: lorella.lotto@unipd.it.
University of Padua · ITUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Italy, like in other countries, issues still exist regarding how to reach high vaccine coverage and several countries have considered policies to increase vaccine uptake. In the present study, we focused on people who have a favorable attitude towards vaccination. In March-April 2021, we asked a representative sample of Italian participants (N = 1,530) to assess to what extent they would support the adoption of a COVID-19 vaccination certificate, excluding unvaccinated people from participating in public and cultural events. Furthermore, as the vaccination coverage increases, severe forms of COVID-19 requiring hospitalization more likely involve unvaccinated individuals, who might be perceived as those who don't contribute to ending the pandemic and who constitute a significant health cost for society. We then asked participants to assess to what extent they would favor the idea of requiring people who refuse the vaccine to pay for their own medical expenses in case of hospitalization. We hypothesized that support for the adoption of the vaccination certificate would be predicted by the COVID-19 vaccination status (received, booked, high-, medium-, low-willingness to be vaccinated, or refused) and by the same factors that are known to affect the willingness to get vaccinated. These factors were also tested in a model aimed at investigating if a vaccinated person would favor a measure requiring the unvaccinated individuals to pay for medical expenses. Results confirmed that the support towards the vaccination certificate policy was strongly predicted by the vaccination status and by factors known to affect the willingness to get vaccinated. Interestingly (and surprisingly), a similar pattern was observed for the support of the policy about medical expenses. In conclusion, support for a COVID-19 vaccination certificate was high among the Italian population in the early phases of the vaccination rollout. The findings are discussed considering potential policies to tackle the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansItalyVaccinationVaccination CoverageCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 public policyCOVID-19 vaccination certificateJudgment and decision-makingMedical expensesRisk perceptionVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36068108
PMCPMC9376303
OpenAlexW4291449263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.