Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36067990›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2022

An Assessment of Household Knowledge and Practices during a Cholera Epidemic- Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 2016.

Sae-Rom Chae, Haji Lukupulo, Sunkyung Kim, Tiffany Walker, Colleen Hardy, Ahmed Abade, Loveness J Urio, Janneth Mghamba, Robert Quick

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring the Impact of Traditional Practices onInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice in a Sample of the Lebanese Population Regarding Cholera.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sae-Rom ChaeDivision of Foodborne and Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Haji LukupuloTanzania Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Sunkyung KimDivision of Foodborne and Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Tiffany WalkerDivision of Foodborne and Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Colleen HardyDivision of Global Health Protection, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ahmed AbadeTanzania Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Loveness J UrioTanzania Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Janneth MghambaMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, United Republic of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Robert QuickDivision of Foodborne and Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From August 15, 2015 to March 5, 2016, Tanzania reported 16,521 cholera cases and 251 deaths, with 4,596 cases and 44 deaths in its largest city, Dar es Salaam. To evaluate outbreak response efforts, we conducted a household survey with drinking water testing in the five most affected wards in Dar es Salaam. We interviewed 641 households 6 months after the beginning of the outbreak. Although most respondents knew that cholera causes diarrhea (90%) and would seek care if suspecting cholera (95%), only 45% were aware of the current outbreak in the area and only 5% would use oral rehydration salts (ORS) if ill. Of 200 (31%) respondents reporting no regular water treatment, 46% believed treatment was unnecessary and 18% believed treatment was too expensive. Fecal contamination was found in 45% of water samples and was associated with water availability (P = 0.047). Only 11% of samples had detectable free chlorine residual, which was associated with water availability (P = 0.025), reported current water treatment (P = 0.006), and observed free chlorine product in the household (P = 0.015). The provision of accessible, adequately chlorinated water supply, and implementation of social mobilization campaigns advocating household water treatment and use of ORS should be prioritized to address gaps in cholera prevention and treatment activities.

Indexed as

CholeraDrinking WaterChlorineElectrolytesHumansSaltsTanzaniaChlorineDrinking WaterElectrolytesSalts

Identifiers

PMID36067990
PMCPMC9651532
OpenAlexW4294783509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.