Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36067797›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2022

Placenta Accreta Spectrum Prenatal Diagnosis Performance: Are Ultrasound False-positive Results Acceptable in Limited-resources Settings?

Albaro José Nieto-Calvache, Juan Pablo Benavides-Calvache, Alejandra Hidalgo, Natalia Padilla, Jaime López-Tenorio, Alejandro Victoria, Martin Rengifo, Mauricio Mejía, Lina María Vergara-Galliadi, Stiven Ernesto Sinisterra-Díaz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders: Current Recommendations from the Perspective of Antenatal Imaging.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Albaro José Nieto-CalvacheClínica de Espectro de Acretismo Placentario, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-5639-9127
Juan Pablo Benavides-CalvacheClínica de Espectro de Acretismo Placentario, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-0141-4809
Alejandra HidalgoCentro de Investigaciones Clínicas, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-7049-2982
Natalia PadillaCentro de Investigaciones Clínicas, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-1468-045X
Jaime López-TenorioClínica de Espectro de Acretismo Placentario, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6563-0033
Alejandro VictoriaClínica de Espectro de Acretismo Placentario, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-3168-2852
Martin RengifoDepartamento de Radiología, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6742-5589
Mauricio MejíaDepartamento de Radiología, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-4335-2084
Lina María Vergara-GalliadiCentro de Investigaciones Clínicas, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-5513-2313
Stiven Ernesto Sinisterra-DíazCentro de Investigaciones Clínicas, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6971-2098
Juliana MayaFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Programa de Medicina, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6467-160X
María Andrea ZambranoFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Programa de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4865-3321
Juan Manuel Burgos-LunaClínica de Espectro de Acretismo Placentario, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-1070-3431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe immediate referral of patients with risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) to specialized centers is recommended, thus favoring an early diagnosis and an interdisciplinary management. However, diagnostic errors are frequent, even in referral centers (RCs). We sought to evaluate the performance of the prenatal diagnosis for PAS in a Latin American hospital.

methodsA retrospective descriptive study including patients referred due to the suspicion of PAS was conducted. Data from the prenatal imaging studies were compared with the final diagnoses (intraoperative and/or histological).

resultsA total of 162 patients were included in the present study. The median gestational age at the time of the first PAS suspicious ultrasound was 29 weeks, but patients arrived at the PAS RC at 34 weeks. The frequency of false-positive results at referring hospitals was 68.5%. Sixty-nine patients underwent surgery based on the suspicion of PAS at 35 weeks, and there was a 28.9% false-positive rate at the RC. In 93 patients, the diagnosis of PAS was ruled out at the RC, with a 2.1% false-negative frequency.

conclusionThe prenatal diagnosis of PAS is better at the RC. However, even in these centers, false-positive results are common; therefore, the intraoperative confirmation of the diagnosis of PAS is essential.

Indexed as

Placenta AccretaFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantPlacentaPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID36067797
PMCPMC9948072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.