Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36067304›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Suppressors of fixation can increase average fitness beyond amplifiers of selection.

Nikhil Sharma, Arne Traulsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mixed updating in structured populations.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Promoters of cooperation in evolutionary games.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Colonization times in Moran process on graphs.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fixation times on directed graphs.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fixation dynamics on hypergraphs.PLoS computational biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Categorizing update mechanisms for graph-structured metapopulations.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nikhil SharmaDepartment of Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0598-016X
Arne TraulsenDepartment of Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0669-5267

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary dynamics on graphs has remarkable features: For example, it has been shown that amplifiers of selection exist that-compared to an unstructured population-increase the fixation probability of advantageous mutations, while they decrease the fixation probability of disadvantageous mutations. So far, the theoretical literature has focused on the case of a single mutant entering a graph-structured population, asking how the graph affects the probability that a mutant takes over a population and the time until this typically happens. For continuously evolving systems, the more relevant case is that mutants constantly arise in an evolving population. Typically, such mutations occur with a small probability during reproduction events. We thus focus on the low mutation rate limit. The probability distribution for the fitness in this process converges to a steady state at long times. Intuitively, amplifiers of selection are expected to increase the population's mean fitness in the steady state. Similarly, suppressors of selection are expected to decrease the population's mean fitness in the steady state. However, we show that another set of graphs, called suppressors of fixation, can attain the highest population mean fitness. The key reason behind this is their ability to efficiently reject deleterious mutants. This illustrates the importance of the deleterious mutant regime for the long-term evolutionary dynamics, something that seems to have been overlooked in the literature so far.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetic FitnessMutationSelection, GeneticModels, GeneticPopulation DynamicsProbabilitydeleterious mutant regimeevolutionary graph theorylow mutation ratesmutation-selection balance

Identifiers

PMID36067304
PMCPMC9478682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.