Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36067218›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2022

Sustained Improvement in Quality of Patient Handoffs After Orthopaedic Surgery I-PASS Intervention.

Derek S Stenquist, Caleb M Yeung, Hannah J Szapary, Laura Rossi, Antonia F Chen, Mitchel B Harris

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Simulation-Based Peer Feedback Module for Pediatric Rapid Response Team Handoffs.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025
    Article
  7. OrthoPass: Long-term Outcomes following Implementation of an Orthopaedic Patient Handoff Template.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Derek S StenquistFrom the Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, MA (Dr. Stenquist, Dr. Yeung); the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Szapary); the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr. Rossi, Dr. Harris); and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr. Chen).
Caleb M Yeung
Hannah J Szapary
Laura Rossi
Antonia F Chen
Mitchel B Harris

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe I-PASS tool has been shown to decrease medical errors in patient handoffs in nonorthopaedic surgery fields. We prospectively studied the implementation of a version of this handoff tool modified for orthopaedic surgery patients in an academic practice at two level I trauma centers.

methodsThis was a prospective study of a multicenter handoff improvement program. Handoffs were evaluated preintervention and at 1, 6, 9, and 18 months postintervention for key data elements defined by I-PASS. Rates of adverse clinical outcomes were compared before and after the handoff intervention.

resultsSeven hundred five electronic patient handoffs were analyzed. From preintervention to the 18-month time point, notable improvement was observed in 8 of 9 targeted quality elements. In Poisson regression analysis, adherence to the standardized handoff format was sustained at markedly improved levels throughout all postintervention time points. No statistically significant differences were observed between rates of 30-day readmission, 90-day readmission, urinary tract infection, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis, surgical site infection, or delirium before and after the intervention.

conclusionIntroduction of an orthopaedic-specific I-PASS tool produced sustained adherence from a group of over 50 orthopaedic providers. Objective quality of handoffs improved markedly as defined by the I-PASS standard, and 86% of the providers supported the ongoing use of the tool. Despite the improvement in handoff quality, we were unable to demonstrate a notable change in measured clinical outcomes. Methods for the development and implementation of the orthopaedic-specific I-PASS tool are described. Orthopaedic residency programs should consider using a version of I-PASS to standardize care.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyOrthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsPatient HandoffHumansProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36067218
PMCPMC9447790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.