Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36067212›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

A computational framework for modelling infectious disease policy based on age and household structure with applications to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Joe Hilton, Heather Riley, Lorenzo Pellis, Rabia Aziza, Samuel P C Brand, Ivy K Kombe, John Ojal, Andrea Parisi, Matt J Keeling, D James Nokes and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Joe HiltonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2787-3827
Heather RileyDepartment of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6133-9292
Lorenzo PellisDepartment of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3436-6487
Rabia AzizaSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3461-2622
Samuel P C BrandSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0645-5367
Ivy K KombeKenya Medical Research Institute - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
John OjalKenya Medical Research Institute - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Andrea ParisiSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2972-9770
Matt J KeelingSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4639-4765
D James NokesSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5426-1984
Robert Manson-SawkoIBM Research Europe, Hartree Centre, Daresbury, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0235-9266
Thomas HouseDepartment of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health 17/63/82Medical Research Council MR/V038613/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 220985/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread, and in many countries unprecedented, use of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for mathematical models which can estimate the impact of these measures while accounting for the highly heterogeneous risk profile of COVID-19. Models accounting either for age structure or the household structure necessary to explicitly model many NPIs are commonly used in infectious disease modelling, but models incorporating both levels of structure present substantial computational and mathematical challenges due to their high dimensionality. Here we present a modelling framework for the spread of an epidemic that includes explicit representation of age structure and household structure. Our model is formulated in terms of tractable systems of ordinary differential equations for which we provide an open-source Python implementation. Such tractability leads to significant benefits for model calibration, exhaustive evaluation of possible parameter values, and interpretability of results. We demonstrate the flexibility of our model through four policy case studies, where we quantify the likely benefits of the following measures which were either considered or implemented in the UK during the current COVID-19 pandemic: control of within- and between-household mixing through NPIs; formation of support bubbles during lockdown periods; out-of-household isolation (OOHI); and temporary relaxation of NPIs during holiday periods. Our ordinary differential equation formulation and associated analysis demonstrate that multiple dimensions of risk stratification and social structure can be incorporated into infectious disease models without sacrificing mathematical tractability. This model and its software implementation expand the range of tools available to infectious disease policy analysts.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesCOVID-19Communicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsPolicySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36067212
PMCPMC9481179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.