ArticlePloS one2022
A feature selection-based framework to identify biomarkers for cancer diagnosis: A focus on lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating temporal morphophysiological and genomic markers for precise classification of flowering time in cannabis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A hybrid feature extraction framework combining PCA and mutual information for gene expression based lung cancer classification.PloS one · 2026Article
- THe Biom: a platform for visualization and exploration of cancer transcriptomic biomarkers identified by robust feature selection.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Models for Cancer Research: A Narrative Review of Bulk RNA-Seq Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Detection of LUAD-Associated Genes Using Wasserstein Distance in Multiomics Feature Selection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in lung cancer: current applications, future perspectives, and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence with temporal features outperforms machine learning in predicting diabetes.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- Evaluation and Exploration of Machine Learning and Convolutional Neural Network Classifiers in Detection of Lung Cancer from Microarray Gene-A Paradigm Shift.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Feature selection for high dimensional microarray gene expression data via weighted signal to noise ratio.PloS one · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer (LC) represents most of the cancer incidences in the world. There are many types of LC, but Lung Adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common type. Although RNA-seq and microarray data provide a vast amount of gene expression data, most of the genes are insignificant to clinical diagnosis. Feature selection (FS) techniques overcome the high dimensionality and sparsity issues of the large-scale data. We propose a framework that applies an ensemble of feature selection techniques to identify genes highly correlated to LUAD. Utilizing LUAD RNA-seq data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we employed mutual information (MI) and recursive feature elimination (RFE) feature selection techniques along with support vector machine (SVM) classification model. We have also utilized Random Forest (RF) as an embedded FS technique. The results were integrated and candidate biomarker genes across all techniques were identified. The proposed framework has identified 12 potential biomarkers that are highly correlated with different LC types, especially LUAD. A predictive model has been trained utilizing the identified biomarker expression profiling and performance of 97.99% was achieved. In addition, upon performing differential gene expression analysis, we could find that all 12 genes were significantly differentially expressed between normal and LUAD tissues, and strongly correlated with LUAD according to previous reports. We here propose that using multiple feature selection methods effectively reduces the number of identified biomarkers and directly affects their biological relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.