Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36067174›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Visual assessment of interactions among resuscitation activity factors in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest using a machine learning model.

Yasuyuki Kawai, Hirozumi Okuda, Arisa Kinoshita, Koji Yamamoto, Keita Miyazaki, Keisuke Takano, Hideki Asai, Yasuyuki Urisono, Hidetada Fukushima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasuyuki KawaiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara City, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3630-6135
Hirozumi OkudaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara City, Nara, Japan.
Arisa KinoshitaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara City, Nara, Japan.
Koji YamamotoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara City, Nara, Japan.
Keita MiyazakiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara City, Nara, Japan.
Keisuke TakanoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara City, Nara, Japan.
Hideki AsaiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara City, Nara, Japan.
Yasuyuki UrisonoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara City, Nara, Japan.
Hidetada FukushimaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara City, Nara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8135-8626
Nara Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe evaluation of the effects of resuscitation activity factors on the outcome of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OHCA) requires consideration of the interactions among these factors. To improve OHCA success rates, this study assessed the prognostic interactions resulting from simultaneously modifying two prehospital factors using a trained machine learning model.

methodsWe enrolled 8274 OHCA patients resuscitated by emergency medical services (EMS) in Nara prefecture, Japan, with a unified activity protocol between January 2010 and December 2018; patients younger than 18 and those with noncardiogenic cardiopulmonary arrest were excluded. Next, a three-layer neural network model was constructed to predict the cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2 at one month based on 24 features of prehospital EMS activity. Using this model, we evaluated the prognostic impact of continuously and simultaneously varying the transport time and the defibrillation or drug-administration time in the test data based on heatmaps.

resultsThe average class sensitivity of the prognostic model was more than 0.86, with a full area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.94 (95% confidence interval of 0.92-0.96). By adjusting the two time factors simultaneously, a nonlinear interaction was obtained between the two adjustments, instead of a linear prediction of the outcome.

conclusionModifications to the parameters using a machine-learning-based prognostic model indicated an interaction among the prognostic factors. These findings could be used to evaluate which factors should be prioritized to reduce time in the trained region of machine learning in order to improve EMS activities.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestHospitalsHumansMachine LearningRegistries

Identifiers

PMID36067174
PMCPMC9447882
OpenAlexW4294843755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.