Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36066930›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Identification of Preterm Labor Evaluation Visits and Extraction of Cervical Length Measures from Electronic Health Records Within a Large Integrated Health Care System: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Fagen Xie, Nehaa Khadka, Michael J Fassett, Vicki Y Chiu, Chantal C Avila, Jiaxiao Shi, Meiyu Yeh, Aniket Kawatkar, Nana A Mensah, David A Sacks and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fagen XieDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1565-0490
Nehaa KhadkaDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5632-2434
Michael J FassettDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente West Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3369-5916
Vicki Y ChiuDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0698-6419
Chantal C AvilaDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1753-5549
Jiaxiao ShiDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8397-3729
Meiyu YehDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5400-8348
Aniket KawatkarDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-6467
Nana A MensahDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8380-0390
David A SacksDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3444-6476
Darios GetahunDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3610-8841
Kaiser Permanente · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth (PTB) represents a significant public health problem in the United States and throughout the world. Accurate identification of preterm labor (PTL) evaluation visits is the first step in conducting PTB-related research.

objectiveWe aimed to develop a validated computerized algorithm to identify PTL evaluation visits and extract cervical length (CL) measures from electronic health records (EHRs) within a large integrated health care system.

methodsWe used data extracted from the EHRs at Kaiser Permanente Southern California between 2009 and 2020. First, we identified triage and hospital encounters with fetal fibronectin (fFN) tests, transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) procedures, PTL medications, or PTL diagnosis codes within 24

resultsA total of 441,673 live birth pregnancies were identified between 2009 and 2020. Of these, 103,139 pregnancies (23.35%) had documented PTL evaluation visits identified by the computerized algorithm. The trend of pregnancies with PTL evaluation visits slightly decreased from 24.41% (2009) to 17.42% (2020). Of the first 103,139 PTL visits, 19,439 (18.85%) and 44,423 (43.97%) had an fFN test and a TVUS, respectively. The percentage of first PTL visits with an fFN test decreased from 18.06% at 24

conclusionsThe developed computerized algorithm effectively identified PTL evaluation visits and extracted the corresponding CL measures from the EHRs. Validation against this algorithm achieved a high level of accuracy. This computerized algorithm can be used for conducting PTL- or PTB-related pharmacoepidemiologic studies and patient care reviews.

Indexed as

cervical lengthclinical notescomputerized algorithmdata extractionelectronic health recordsevaluation notesfetal fibronectinnatural language processingpatient carepatient notespatient recordspreterm birthpreterm labortransvaginal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36066930
PMCPMC9490529
OpenAlexW4290960423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.