Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36066781›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2023

Statistical Properties of a Virtual Cohort for In Silico Trials Generated with a Statistical Anatomy Atlas.

Antonino A La Mattina, Fabio Baruffaldi, Mark Taylor, Marco Viceconti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computational modelling of biological systems now and then: revisiting tools and visions from the beginning of the century.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Why Animal Experiments Are Still Indispensable in Bone Research: A Statement by the European Calcified Tissue Society.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonino A La MattinaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna (IT), Bologna, Italy. antonino.lamattina@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9927-2393
Fabio BaruffaldiMedical Technology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8784-5652
Mark TaylorMedical Device Research Institute, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7842-6472
Marco VicecontiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna (IT), Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2293-1530

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 101016503Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 823712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis-related hip fragility fractures are a catastrophic event for patient lives but are not frequently observed in prospective studies, and therefore phase III clinical trials using fractures as primary clinical endpoint require thousands of patients enrolled for several years to reach statistical significance. A novel answer to the large number of subjects needed to reach the desired evidence level is offered by In Silico Trials, that is, the simulation of a clinical trial on a large cohort of virtual patients, monitoring the biomarkers of interest. In this work we investigated if statistical aliasing from a custom anatomy atlas could be used to expand the patient cohort while retaining the original biomechanical characteristics. We used a pair-matched cohort of 94 post-menopausal women (at the time of the CT scan, 47 fractured and 47 not fractured) to create a statistical anatomy atlas through principal component analysis, and up-sampled the atlas in order to obtain over 1000 synthetic patient models. We applied the biomechanical computed tomography pipeline to the resulting virtual cohort and compared its fracture risk distribution with that of the original physical cohort. While the distribution of femoral strength values in the non-fractured sub-group was nearly identical to that of the original physical cohort, that of the fractured sub-group was lower than in the physical cohort. Nonetheless, by using the classification threshold used for the original population, the synthetic population was still divided into two parts of approximatively equal number.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesOsteoporosisBone DensityClinical Trials as TopicFemaleFemurHumansProspective StudiesBone biomechanicsCohort expansionIn silico trialsProximal femur fractureStatistical atlas

Identifiers

PMID36066781
PMCPMC9832093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.