ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
3D printing of alginate/thymoquinone/halloysite nanotube bio-scaffolds for cartilage repairs: experimental and numerical study.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomimetic Scaffolds-A Novel Approach to Three Dimensional Cell Culture Techniques for Potential Implementation in Tissue Engineering.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Additive manufacturing of sustainable biomaterials for biomedical applications.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the newest advances in 3D printing is the printing process of bio-scaffolds. The 3D printing of true materials for cartilage repairs accelerates cell growth and proliferation. In this study, a novel biomaterial was developed for the 3D printing of cartilage scaffolds composed of alginate, thymoquinone and halloysite nanotube. Calcium chloride was used as a cross-linker to form hydrogels. Experimental and numerical studies such as scanning electron microscopy, experimental tensile tests, and compression tests, chondrocyte cell seed, and MTT assay were also done. According to the results, alginate and halloysite nanotube increased the printing quality and mechanical performance of biomaterials. Tensile strength in bio-ink with the 30 mg/ml of alginate, 40 mg/ml of halloysite nanotube with 5% of thymoquinone increased up to 372 ± 42 kPa, while compressive stress reached 894 ± 39 kPa. Numerical results indicated that tensile and compressive properties of the scaffold structure depend on the space between printed rows. The best structure was obtained when the distance of rows was chosen at 0.4 mm, and the nozzle diameter was 0.3 mm. Finally, the biomaterial with the 30 mg/ml of alginate, 40 mg/ml of halloysite nanotube with 5% of thymoquinone showed a high mechanical and biological performance, compared to pure alginate bio-scaffolds. Biomaterials included alginic acid sodium salt/thymoquinone/halloysite nanotube mixed and 3D printed in high technology bioprinter, then mechanical and biological properties of printed bio-scaffolds obtained by different experimental tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.