Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36066706›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Mitotic Index Analysis.

Takamitsu A Kato, Jeremy S Haskins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takamitsu A KatoDepartment of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. Takamitsu.Kato@Colostate.edu.
Jeremy S HaskinsDepartment of Pediatrics and Human Development & Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Colorado State University · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular division is a fundamental process of cellular growth. First, cells replicate their DNA in S phase and then undergo mitosis which, under normal conditions, leads to complete cell division. Moreover, mitotic activity correlates to cellular growth activity. The simplest and classical method to measure mitotic activity (mitotic index (MI)), is the manual counting of mitotic cells among a given cell population of interest. The latter can be accomplished via phase contrast microscope observation. However, Giemsa staining may improve accuracy and consistency. Fluorescence immunostaining targeting specific phosphorylations of proteins at critical cell cycle steps will provide further improved analysis via high-throughput capacity of flow or imaging cytometer. Finally, time lapse image analysis provides quantitative and qualitative metrics delineating the process of cellular division including timing of division, duration of mitosis, and failure to procced through or complete mitosis.

Indexed as

MitosisCell CycleMitotic IndexPhosphorylationS PhaseHistone H3 serine residue 10Mitotic indexTime lapse image analysis

Identifiers

PMID36066706
OpenAlexW4294723098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.