Observational studyNeurosurgical review2022
Learning curve and influencing factors of performing microsurgical anastomosis: a laboratory prospective study.
Observational study in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Are free flaps a reliable solution to treat massive soft tissue defects in patients with knee periprosthetic joint infection? A systematic review and meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Microvascular errors of technique: a systematic review.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Pooled it
- Microscopic Fasciectomy in Dupuytren Disease: Early Clinical Outcomes and Technical Advantages-A District General Hospital Experience.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Development of Teleoperated Robotic System for Remote Intraocular Microsurgery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Validation of simulator-based neuroangiographical training.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Editorial: Surgical skills and continuing medical education in neurosurgery: past, present and future.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Accuracy Analysis of Computer-Assisted and Guided Dental Implantology by Comparing 3D Planning Data and Actual Implant Placement in a Mandibular Training Model: A Monocentric Comparison between Dental Students and Trained Implantologists.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Microfasciectomy in Dupuytren's disease: microsurgery in the evolution toward safer and more efficient fasciectomy and hand surgery.EFORT open reviews · 2023Review
- 3D Exoscopes in Experimental Microanastomosis: A Comparison of Different Systems.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The implementation of simulators in neurosurgery training. The application of the simulator program in Peru.Surgical neurology international · 2023Article
- Editorial: From simulation to the operating theatre: new insights in translational surgery.Frontiers in medical technology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite being a critical component of any cerebrovascular procedure, acquiring skills in microsurgical anastomosis is challenging for trainees. In this context, simulation models, especially laboratory training, enable trainees to master microsurgical techniques before performing real surgeries. The objective of this study was to identify the factors influencing the learning curve of microsurgical training. A prospective observational study was conducted during a 7-month diploma in microsurgical techniques carried out in the anatomy laboratory of the school of surgery. Training focused on end-to-end (ETE) and end-to-side (ETS) anastomoses performed on the abdominal aorta, vena cava, internal carotid and jugular vein, femoral artery and vein, caudal artery, etc. of Wistar strain rats under supervision of 2 expert anatomical trainers. Objective and subjective data were collected after each training session. The 44 microsurgical trainees enrolled in the course performed 1792 anastomoses (1577 ETE, 88%, vs. 215 ETS, 12%). The patency rate of 41% was independent from the trainees' surgical background and previous experience. The dissection and the temporary clamping time both significantly decreased over the months (p < 0.001). Technical mistakes were independently associated with thrombosis of the anastomoses, as assessed by the technical mistakes score (p < 0.01). The training duration (in weeks) at time of each anastomosis was the only significant predictor of permeability (p < 0.001). Training duration and technical mistakes constituted the two major factors driving the learning curve. Future studies should try and investigate other factors (such as access to wet laboratory, dedicated fellowships, mentoring during early years as junior consultant/attending) influencing the retention of surgical skills for our difficult and challenging discipline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36066661What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.