Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36066628›Full record

Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Medication adherence with denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors treated in routine clinical settings: a retrospective study.

Ingo J Diel, Richard Greil, Jan Janssen, Christian W Kluike, Bagmeet Behera, Ali Abbasi, Anouchka Seesaghur, Michael Kellner, Christine Jaeger, Katja Bjorklof and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating risk factors for skeletal-related events among bone metastases from solid tumors.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Ingo J DielPraxisklinik Am Rosengarten, Augustaanlage 7-11, 68165, Mannheim, Germany. ingodiel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5717-1909
Richard GreilParacelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Salzburg, Austria.
Jan JanssenMedizinische Studiengesellschaft Nord-West GmbH, Westerstede, Germany.
Christian W KluikePraxis für Urologie Kluike und Weiler, Lüneburg, Germany.
Bagmeet BeheraAmgen Research Munich GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Ali AbbasiCenter for Observational Research, Amgen, Uxbridge, UK.
Anouchka SeesaghurCenter for Observational Research, Amgen, Uxbridge, UK.
Michael KellnerAmgen GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Christine JaegerAmgen GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Katja BjorklofAmgen Europe GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Antoaneta TomovaComplex Oncology Center Plovdiv EOOD, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Ferdinand HaslbauerSalzkammergut Klinikum Vöcklabruck, Vöcklabruck, Austria.
Amgen (Germany) · DEAmgen (United Kingdom) · GBAmgen (Switzerland) · CHMedical University Plovdiv · BGOrthopädische Praxis · DEParacelsus Medical University · ATPathologie Hamburg-West · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe (non)adherence with denosumab among patients with solid tumors and bone metastases.

methodsThis retrospective, observational study pooled data from two completed prospective, multicenter cohort studies (X-TREME; Study 240) in adult patients with bone metastases from primary breast, prostate, lung, kidney, or other solid cancer types and administered denosumab 120 mg in routine clinical practice in Germany and Central and Eastern Europe. The studies were conducted between May 2012 and May 2017; pooled analysis was completed in August 2021. Medication adherence was described according to a three-component consensus taxonomy: initiation (first-ever administration ≤ 90 days from bone metastasis diagnosis), implementation (actual vs prescribed dosing; optimal implementation = regular/consistent dosing), and persistence (≤ 60-day gap between administrations at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months). Descriptive analyses were conducted for each cancer type.

resultsThe analysis included 1748 patients with solid tumors and bone metastases. Adherence with denosumab was generally high across the initiation, implementation, and persistence phases. Most patients experienced timely initiation (from 64.4% [kidney cancer] to 81.2% [breast cancer]) and optimal implementation (from 62.4% [lung cancer] to 72.5% [breast cancer]). The proportion of patients who were persistent with treatment at 6 months ranged from 41.4% (lung cancer) to 77.8% (prostate cancer).

conclusionsThis study revealed variations by cancer type in the initiation, implementation, and persistence of denosumab in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in routine clinical practice. Further cancer-specific studies are warranted to examine the determinants of (non)adherence with denosumab, and potential ways to improve medication adherence.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsAdultDenosumabHumansMaleMedication AdherenceProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDenosumabImplementationInitiationMedication adherencePersistenceReal-world study

Identifiers

PMID36066628
PMCPMC9446633
OpenAlexW4294794322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.