Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36066616›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2022

Trajectories and prognostic factors for recovery after hip fracture: a longitudinal cohort study.

Leonie de Munter, Cornelis L P van de Ree, Olav P van der Jagt, Taco Gosens, Huub A A M Maas, Mariska A C de Jongh

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02508675 (Prevalence, Recovery Patterns and Risk Factors of Non-fatal Outcome and Costs After Trauma; a Prospective Follow up Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02508675 unknown statusnot on this map

Prevalence, Recovery Patterns and Risk Factors of Non-fatal Outcome and Costs After Trauma; a Prospective Follow up Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNetwork Emergency Care BrabantRan2015 to 2018Enrolled6,500ConditionsTrauma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leonie de MunterDepartment Trauma TopCare, ETZ Hospital (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands. l.demunter@etz.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6573-2032
Cornelis L P van de ReeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, ETZ Hospital (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Olav P van der JagtDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, ETZ Hospital (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Taco GosensDepartment Trauma TopCare, ETZ Hospital (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Huub A A M MaasDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, ETZ Hospital (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Mariska A C de JonghDepartment Trauma TopCare, ETZ Hospital (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to determine recovery trajectories and prognostic factors for poor recovery in frail and non-frail patients after hip fracture.

methodsPatients with a hip fracture aged 65 years and older admitted to a hospital in the Netherlands from August 2015 to November 2016 were asked to complete questionnaires at one week and one, three, six, 12, and 24 months after injury. The questionnaires included the ICEpop CAPability measure for older people, Health Utility Index, and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale. Latent class trajectory analysis was used to determine trajectories of recovery. Patient and injury characteristics for favourable and unfavourable outcome were compared with logistic regression.

resultsIn total, 696 patients were included of which 367 (53%) patients were frail. Overall, recovery trajectories in frail patients were worse compared to trajectories in non-frail patients. In frail patients, poor recovery was significantly associated with dementia. Lower age was a prognostic factor for good recovery. Immobility, loneliness and weight loss were prognostic for respectively poor capability and symptoms of anxiety and depression. In non-frail patients, recovery after hip fracture was associated with loneliness and the type of hip fracture.

conclusionAlthough frailty is associated with poor recovery in older patients with hip fracture, a large proportion of frail patients show good recovery. Loneliness determines poor recovery with anxiety and depressive symptoms. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02508675 (July 27, 2015).

Indexed as

Hip FracturesAgedAnxietyCohort StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesPrognosisFrailtyHealth statusHip fracturesLatent class analysisLongitudinal studiesRecovery

Identifiers

PMID36066616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.