ArticleAnnals of hematology2022
Efficacy and steroid-sparing effect of tacrolimus in patients with autoimmune cytopenia.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Topical Tacrolimus in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Tacrolimus shows adequate efficacy in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies associated thrombocytopenia: a retrospective cohort study.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and steroid-sparing effect of tacrolimus in patients with autoimmune cytopenia, including immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), and Evans syndrome (ES). Patients in the tacrolimus group were treated with tacrolimus in combination with steroids, and the control group received only steroids. Of the 318 patients finally enrolled, 87 (27.4%) were males, with a median age of 45 (14-90) years. The tacrolimus group comprised 144 patients, including 120 ITP, 19 AIHA, and 5 ES patients, and the control group comprised 174 patients, including 141 ITP, 25 AIHA, and 8 ES patients. The optimal ORR of the tacrolimus group was comparable to that of the control group, and the optimal CRR was higher (p < 0.05). Patients receiving tacrolimus had a decreased relapse rate and prolonged relapse-free survival (p < 0.05) compared with the controls for both the whole cohort and the ITP and AIHA subgroups. Compared with the control group, the tacrolimus group had a lower cumulative steroid dosage and earlier discontinuation of steroids (p < 0.05), which resulted in a decreased incidence of steroid-related adverse events (p < 0.05) although the total side effects were similar between the two groups. Similar drug expenses were observed between the tacrolimus and control groups at the 18-month follow-up. In conclusion, the early addition of tacrolimus had a similar ORR, better CRR, lower relapse rate, and prolonged relapse-free survival compared to steroids alone, with reduced steroid-related adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.