Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36066439›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023

Physical distance to sensory-motor landmarks predicts language function.

Xiuyi Wang, Katya Krieger-Redwood, Meichao Zhang, Zaixu Cui, Xiaokang Wang, Theodoros Karapanagiotidis, Yi Du, Robert Leech, Boris C Bernhardt, Daniel S Margulies and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The intrinsic cortical geometry of reading.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiuyi WangCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8197-6229
Katya Krieger-RedwoodDepartment of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Meichao ZhangDepartment of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Zaixu CuiChinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing 102206, China.
Xiaokang WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Theodoros KarapanagiotidisDepartment of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Yi DuCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4512-5221
Robert LeechCentre for Neuroimaging Science, Kings College London, London, UK.
Boris C BernhardtMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Daniel S MarguliesIntegrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center (UMR 8002), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Jonathan SmallwoodDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Elizabeth JefferiesDepartment of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory language comprehension recruits cortical regions that are both close to sensory-motor landmarks (supporting auditory and motor features) and far from these landmarks (supporting word meaning). We investigated whether the responsiveness of these regions in task-based functional MRI is related to individual differences in their physical distance to primary sensorimotor landmarks. Parcels in the auditory network, that were equally responsive across story and math tasks, showed stronger activation in individuals who had less distance between these parcels and transverse temporal sulcus, in line with the predictions of the "tethering hypothesis," which suggests that greater proximity to input regions might increase the fidelity of sensory processing. Conversely, language and default mode parcels, which were more active for the story task, showed positive correlations between individual differences in activation and sensory-motor distance from primary sensory-motor landmarks, consistent with the view that physical separation from sensory-motor inputs supports aspects of cognition that draw on semantic memory. These results demonstrate that distance from sensorimotor regions provides an organizing principle of functional differentiation within the cortex. The relationship between activation and geodesic distance to sensory-motor landmarks is in opposite directions for cortical regions that are proximal to the heteromodal (DMN and language network) and unimodal ends of the principal gradient of intrinsic connectivity.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingHumansLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhysical Distancingdefault mode networkgeodesic distancegradientlanguage

Identifiers

PMID36066439
PMCPMC10110440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.