ArticleInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2022
Trileaflet semilunar valve reconstruction: pulsatile in vitro evaluation.
Article in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simulation-based modeling of aortic valve neocuspidization with oversized pericardial leaflets.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Impact of Tissue Freezing on the Functional and Biomechanical Characteristics of Porcine Aortic Roots.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesResidual regurgitation is common after congenital surgery for right ventricular outflow tract malformation. It is accepted as there is no competent valve solution in a growing child. We investigated a new surgical technique of trileaflet semilunar valve reconstruction possessing the potential of remaining sufficient and allowing for some growth with the child. In this proof-of-concept study, our aim was to evaluate if it is achievable as a functional pulmonary valve reconstruction in vitro.
methodsExplanted pulmonary trunks from porcine hearts were evaluated in a pulsatile flow-loop model. First, the native pulmonary trunk was investigated, after which the native leaflets were explanted. Then, trileaflet semilunar valve reconstruction was performed and investigated. All valves were initially investigated at a flow output of 4 l/min and subsequently at 7 l/min. The characterization was based on hydrodynamic pressure and echocardiographic measurements.
resultsEight pulmonary trunks were evaluated. All valves are competent on colour Doppler. There is no difference in mean pulmonary systolic artery pressure gradient at 4 l/min (P = 0.32) and at 7 l/min (P = 0.20). Coaptation length is increased in the neo-valve at 4 l/min (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.008) and at 7 l/min (P < 0.001, P = 0.006, P = 0.006). A windmill shape is observed in all neo-valves.
conclusionsTrileaflet semilunar valve reconstruction is sufficient and non-stenotic. It resulted in an increased coaptation length and a windmill shape, which is speculated to decrease with the growth of the patient, yet remains sufficient as a transitional procedure until a long-term solution is feasible. Further in vivo investigations are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.