Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36066382›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2023

Evaluation outcomes of an alcohol and pregnancy campaign targeting multiple audiences.

Simone Pettigrew, Leon Booth, Tahnee McCausland, Kelly Kennington, Mia Miller, Jacqueline Bowden, Julia Stafford

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Simone PettigrewThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3921-1174
Leon BoothThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6326-1908
Tahnee McCauslandMental Health Commission, Western Australian Government, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2777-2839
Kelly KenningtonMental Health Commission, Western Australian Government, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7473-2920
Mia MillerThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0755-8624
Jacqueline BowdenNational Centre for Education and Training on Addition, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1983-8930
Julia StaffordCancer Council Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5959-0525
Government of Western Australia · AUUNSW Sydney · AUCancer Council Western Australia · AUCurtin University · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mass media campaign alerting the public to the potential harms of alcohol to unborn babies and to inform future intervention efforts.

methodAn online survey was administered to 889 adult Western Australians. The survey assessed demographic characteristics, typical alcohol use, recognition and perceptions of the campaign, and behavioural changes resulting from campaign exposure. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with perceived campaign effectiveness.

resultsMost respondents reported having seen/heard the campaign on at least one form of media (71%). Most considered the campaign to be believable (89%), clear (88%), trustworthy (87%), memorable (82%) and among the best they had seen (78%). As a result of campaign exposure, a large majority reported increased concern about drinking during pregnancy (85%) and most female respondents reported being much less likely to use alcohol during a pregnancy (83%). One-third of female respondents (33%) reported that as a result of being exposed to the campaign they had decided not to consume alcohol while pregnant. Confidence to abstain, awareness of strategies to abstain, lower socioeconomic position, residing in the metropolitan area and recognising the campaign were significantly associated with greater perceived campaign effectiveness. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsResults indicate the campaign was well received by respondents, increased concern about drinking alcohol during pregnancy and positively influenced women's intentions to refrain from drinking while pregnant. Well-designed campaigns on alcohol avoidance during pregnancy can be considered acceptable and effective by target audiences.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingHealth PromotionAdultAustraliaEthanolFemaleHumansIntentionPregnancyEthanolalcoholcampaignevaluationpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36066382
PMCPMC10087540
OpenAlexW4294786211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.