Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36066247›Full record

ReviewHealth policy and planning2022

Health financing policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the first stages in the WHO South-East Asia Region.

Thomas Gadsden, Belinda Ford, Blake Angell, Bojan Sumarac, Valeria de Oliveira Cruz, Hui Wang, Tsolmon Tsilaajav, Stephen Jan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health policy and planning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reorienting health systems towards Primary Health Care in South Asia.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas GadsdenThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Level 5/1 King Street, Newtown, Sydney, New South Wales 2042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9371-420X
Belinda FordThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Level 5/1 King Street, Newtown, Sydney, New South Wales 2042, Australia.
Blake AngellThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Level 5/1 King Street, Newtown, Sydney, New South Wales 2042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7188-7740
Bojan SumaracThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Level 5/1 King Street, Newtown, Sydney, New South Wales 2042, Australia.
Valeria de Oliveira CruzHealth Financing and Governance, World Health Organization South-East Asia Regional Office, World Health House, Indraprastha Estate, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, New Delhi 110 002, India.
Hui WangHealth Financing and Governance, World Health Organization South-East Asia Regional Office, World Health House, Indraprastha Estate, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, New Delhi 110 002, India.
Tsolmon TsilaajavHealth Financing and Governance, World Health Organization South-East Asia Regional Office, World Health House, Indraprastha Estate, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, New Delhi 110 002, India.
Stephen JanThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Level 5/1 King Street, Newtown, Sydney, New South Wales 2042, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUWorld Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia · INThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 imposed unprecedented financing requirements on countries to rapidly implement effective prevention and control measures while dealing with severe economic contraction. The challenges were particularly acute for the 11 countries in the WHO South-East Asia Region (SEAR), home to the lowest average level of public expenditure on health of all WHO regions. We conducted a narrative review of peer-reviewed, grey literature and publicly available sources to analyse the immediate health financing policies adopted by countries in the WHO SEAR in response to COVID-19 in the first 12 months of the pandemic, i.e. from 1 March 2020 to 1 March 2021. Our review focused on the readiness of health systems to address the financial challenges of COVID-19 in terms of revenue generation, financial protection and strategic purchasing including public financial management issues. Twenty peer-reviewed articles were included, and web searches identified media articles (n = 21), policy reports (n = 18) and blog entries (n = 5) from reputable sources. We found that countries in the SEAR demonstrated great flexibility in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, including exploring various options for revenue raising, removing financial barriers to care and rapidly adapting purchasing arrangements. At the same time, the pandemic exposed pre-existing health financing policy weaknesses such as underinvestment, inadequate regulatory capacity of the private health sector and passive purchasing, which should give countries an impetus for reform towards more resilient health systems. Further monitoring and evaluation are needed to assess the long-term implications of policy responses on issues such as government capacity for debt servicing and fiscal space for health and how they protect progress towards the objectives of universal health coverage.

Indexed as

COVID-19Healthcare FinancingAsia, EasternHealth PolicyHumansPandemicsWorld Health OrganizationCOVID-19financial protectionhealth system financingSouth-East Asia

Identifiers

PMID36066247
PMCPMC9661300
OpenAlexW4294755139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.