Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36066104›Full record

SynthesisPsychological medicine2023

The effectiveness of peer support for individuals with mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dorien Smit, Clara Miguel, Janna N Vrijsen, Bart Groeneweg, Jan Spijker, Pim Cuijpers

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 80 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
27.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06398561 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Peer-led Intervention for Individuals With Major Depression.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of the Balearic IslandsRan2024 to 2026Enrolled81ConditionsDepressive Disorder, MajorArmsActive Patient Program
NCT06528132 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Social Worker-led Mindfulness-based Intervention for Managing Depressive Symptoms in Community-dwelling Older Adults in Hong Kong: A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2024 to 2026Enrolled207ConditionsDepressive SymptomsArmsMindfulness-based intervention (MBI) (enhanced with peer supporters), Experimental: social worker-led MBI (without peer supporters)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Loneliness, Self-Efficacy and Adaptive Coping: Mixed Methods Analysis of Mediation in a Peer Support Intervention for Depression.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2025
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dorien SmitPro Persona Mental Health Care, Pro Persona Research, Depression Expertise Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0874-5413
Clara MiguelDepartment of Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5563-5896
Janna N VrijsenPro Persona Mental Health Care, Pro Persona Research, Depression Expertise Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0317-6696
Bart GroenewegDutch Depression (Patient) Association, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Jan SpijkerPro Persona Mental Health Care, Pro Persona Research, Depression Expertise Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1480-9647
Pim CuijpersDepartment of Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5497-2743
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefits of peer support interventions (PSIs) for individuals with mental illness are not well known. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of PSIs for individuals with mental illness for clinical, personal, and functional recovery outcomes.

methodsSearches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO (December 18, 2020). Included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing peer-delivered PSIs to control conditions. The quality of records was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool. Data were pooled for each outcome, using random-effects models.

resultsAfter screening 3455 records, 30 RCTs were included in the systematic review and 28 were meta-analyzed (4152 individuals). Compared to control conditions, peer support was associated with small but significant post-test effect sizes for

conclusionsPSIs may be effective for the clinical and personal recovery of mental illness. Effects are modest, though consistent, suggesting potential efficacy for PSI across a wide range of mental disorders and intervention types.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersCounselingHumansClinical recoverydepressionfunctional recoverymental illnessmeta-analysispeer support interventionspersonal recoveryserious mental illnesssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36066104
PMCPMC10476060
OpenAlexW4294763190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.