Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36066037›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2022

Development and reliability and validity test of the Fear of Cancer Scale (FOCS).

Lin-Sen Feng, Xiao-Qian Wu, Qing-Li Li, Qing Yang, Fu-Lin Yin, Qi-Yao Wang, Yu-Lu Zhu, Ruo-Yu Yan, Chang-Ling Tu, Li-Ying Yang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the Fear of Cancer Scale.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lin-Sen FengThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (The People's Hospital of Yuxi City), Yunnan, PR China.ORCID 0000-0003-0329-9936
Xiao-Qian WuThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (The People's Hospital of Yuxi City), Yunnan, PR China.
Qing-Li LiNo.1 School of Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical University, Yunnan, PR China.
Qing YangSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Yunnan, PR China.
Fu-Lin YinSchool of Basic Medicine, Kunming Medical University, Yunnan, PR China.
Qi-Yao WangNo.1 School of Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical University, Yunnan, PR China.
Yu-Lu ZhuNo.1 School of Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical University, Yunnan, PR China.
Ruo-Yu YanThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (The People's Hospital of Yuxi City), Yunnan, PR China.
Chang-Ling TuThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Cancer Hospital), Yunnan, PR China.
Li-Ying YangKunming Health Vocational College, Yunnan, PR China.
Wen-Jue ZhongGraduate School, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Zheng-Jiao DongThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (The People's Hospital of Yuxi City), Yunnan, PR China.
Kunming Medical University · CNChulalongkorn University · THYunnan Vocational College of Mechanical and Electrical Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a Fear of Cancer Scale (FOCS) for non-cancer populations.

methodsFOCS was developed by classical measurement theory. A total of 15 college students were invited to conduct semi-structured interviews. Seven experts were invited for expert consultation. A total of 2012 Chinese college students who had completed the electronic questionnaire on WJX.cn platform was included. The reliability and validity of FOCS were verified. Multiple linear regression analysis was adopted to explore the influencing factors of cancer fear among college students and further verify the validity of FOCS.

resultsThere were 17 items in the FOCS, including two subscales - direct fear (8 items), and indirect fear (9 items). FOCS had good validity and reliability. Multiple linear regression showed that GAD-7 score, CSDS score, negative coping score, positive coping score, guardian's highest education, gender, life satisfaction, nationality and major were the influencing factors of cancer fear (

conclusionsThe 17-item FOCS was a reliable and valid measure to examine the level of cancer fear in non-cancer populations.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsFearHumansPhobic DisordersPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesanxietycoping styleFear of Cancer Scalereliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID36066037
PMCPMC9467598
OpenAlexW4294733052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.