Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36065742›Full record

ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2022

Safety Assessment of Conventional and Biological Systemic Therapy in Older Adults with Psoriasis, a Real-world Multicentre Cohort Study.

Elke L M Ter Haar, Eline E Ten Bruin, Ewald E Bronkhorst, Rinke J Borgonjen, Marloes M Kleinpenning, Else N Kop, M Birgitte Visch, Peter C M Van de Kerkhof, Elke M G J De Jong, Satish F K Lubeek

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elke L M Ter HaarDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Post Office Box 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. elke.terhaar@radboudumc.nl.
Eline E Ten BruinDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Post Office Box 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ewald E BronkhorstDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Rinke J BorgonjenDepartment of Dermatology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital and Padberg Clinic, Ede, the Netherlands.
Marloes M KleinpenningDepartment of Dermatology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Else N KopDepartment of Dermatology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, the Netherlands.
M Birgitte VischDepartment of Dermatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Peter C M Van de KerkhofDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Post Office Box 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Elke M G J De JongDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Satish F K LubeekDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal selection of systemic therapy in older adults with psoriasis can be challenging, due to sparse evidence-based guidance. This multicentre retrospective study investigated the safety of systemic therapy with causality assessment in a real-world cohort of older adults (≥ 65 years) with psoriasis. Data from 6 hospitals on (serious) adverse events were collected, causality assessment performed and incidence rate ratios calculated. Potential predictors for adverse events-occurrence were studied using multivariable logistic regression analysis. In total, 117 patients with 176 treatment episodes and 390 patient-years were included, comprising 115 (65.3%) and 61 (34.7%) treatment episodes with conventional systemic therapy and biologics/apremilast, respectively. After causality assessment, 232 of 319 (72.7%) adverse events remained and were analysed further, including 12 serious adverse events. No significant differences in incidence rate ratios were found between the systemic treatment types. In regression analysis, increasing age was associated with causality assessed adverse events-occurrence (odds ratio 1.195; p=0.022). Comorbidity, polypharmacy, and treatment type were not associated with causality assessed adverse events-occurrence. In conclusion, increasing age was associated with a higher causality assessed adverse events-occurrence. Causality assessed serious adverse events were rare, reversible and/or manageable in clinical practice. In conclusion, the safety profile of systemic antipsoriatic therapy within this population is reassuring.

Indexed as

Dermatologic AgentsPsoriasisAgedCohort StudiesHumansIncidenceRetrospective StudiesDermatologic Agents

Identifiers

PMID36065742
PMCPMC9677276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.