Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36065635›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2022

Assessment of body perception disturbances in complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review using the COSMIN guideline.

Sessi Acapo, Thomas Osinski, Thomas Rulleau, Arnaud Dupeyron, Julien Nizard

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pain (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sessi AcapoEA 4391 Excitabilité Nerveuse et Therapeutique, Université Paris Est, Créteil, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4699-1706
Thomas OsinskiUR 20201 ERPHAN, Université Versailles Saint Quentin, Garches, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9653-9972
Thomas RulleauNantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2205-132X
Arnaud DupeyronPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, CHU Nîmes, University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5085-3739
Julien NizardEA 4391 Excitabilité Nerveuse et Therapeutique, Université Paris Est, Créteil, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1907-8628
Université Paris-Est Créteil · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct a systematic review to identify which tools are being used to assess body perception disturbances in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) and to provide an evidence-based recommendation in the selection of an assessment tool, based on measurement properties. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: Five electronic databases (EMBASE, Pubmed, PsycInfo, Science Direct and Web of Science) were searched for English or French written articles, with no time restrictions. All original articles using a body perception assessment tool with adult patients with CRPS were selected, regardless of their design (controlled trials, single case, qualitative study). Two investigators screened abstracts, selected full articles and extracted data independently.

resultsThirty-eight full-text papers were obtained and three main methods to evaluate body perception disturbances were identified: The Bath Body Perception Disturbance Scale, the Neglect-like Symptoms questionnaire adapted from Galer and the patient's body perception description. No full psychometric assessments were found. The Limb Laterality Recognition Task was also used in conjunction with another method.

conclusionsThree main assessment methods for CRPS body perception disturbances are currently used. Full psychometric evaluation has not been completed for any of the assessment methods. As a consequence, we could not fully apply the COSMIN guideline. To date, there is no agreement concerning the use of a specific questionnaire or scale. The results indicate a need for further research such as psychometric properties of these questionnaires. SIGNIFICANCE: This systematic review identified body perception disturbances assessment methods and their the psychometric properties in order to provide help and guidance to researchers and clinicians to investigate those clinical features.

Indexed as

Complex Regional Pain SyndromesIllusionsAdultHumansPsychometricsQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36065635
PMCPMC9826130
OpenAlexW4294707579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.