Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36065588›Full record

Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2022

Diabetes Mellitus and the Benefit of Antiresorptive Therapy on Fracture Risk.

Richard Eastell, Eric Vittinghoff, Li-Yung Lui, Susan K Ewing, Ann V Schwartz, Douglas C Bauer, Dennis M Black, Mary L Bouxsein

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Differences and similarities in cortical bone of the femur between donors with and without type 2 diabetes.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Prevalence and risk factors for osteoporosis in type 1 diabetes-results from an observational study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Observational
  10. Review
  11. Biases in the performance of FRAX without BMD in predicting fracture risk in a multiethnic population with diabetes: the Diabetes and Aging Study.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. KIAA0753 enhances osteoblast differentiation suppressed by diabetes.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Bone Health in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard EastellDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0323-3366
Eric VittinghoffDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8535-0920
Li-Yung LuiResearch Institute, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Susan K EwingDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1153-828X
Ann V SchwartzDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Douglas C BauerDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Dennis M BlackDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5318-7575
Mary L BouxseinCenter for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7027-7414
University of California, San Francisco · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCalifornia Pacific Medical Center · USUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with increased risk of fractures. However, it is unclear whether current osteoporosis treatments reduce fractures in individuals with diabetes. The aim of the study was to determine whether presence of T2D influences the efficacy of antiresorptive treatment for osteoporosis using the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH)-American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)-Study to Advance Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as a Regulatory Endpoint (SABRE) cohort, which includes individual patient data from randomized trials of osteoporosis therapies. In this study we included 96,385 subjects, 6.8% of whom had T2D, from nine bisphosphonate trials, two selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) trials, two trials of menopausal hormone therapy, one denosumab trial, and one odanacatib trial. We used Cox regression to obtain the treatment hazard ratio (HR) for incident nonvertebral, hip, and all fractures and logistic regression to obtain the treatment odds ratio (OR) for incident morphometric vertebral fractures, separately for T2D and non-DM. We used linear regression to estimate the effect of treatment on 2-year change in BMD (n = 49,099) and 3-month to 12-month change in bone turnover markers (n = 12,701) by diabetes status. In all analyses, we assessed the interaction between treatment and diabetes status. In pooled analyses of all 15 trials, we found that diabetes did not impact treatment efficacy, with similar reductions in vertebral, nonvertebral, all, and hip fractures, increases in total hip and femoral neck BMD, and reductions in serum C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide (CTX), urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen/creatinine (NTX/Cr) and procollagen type 1 N propeptide (P1NP) (all interactions p > 0.05). We found similar results for the pooled analysis of bisphosphonate trials. However, when we considered trials individually, we found a few interactions within individual studies between diabetes status and the effects of denosumab and odanacatib on fracture risk, change in BMD or bone turnover markers (BTMs). In sum, these results provide strong evidence that bisphosphonates and most licensed antiresorptive drugs are effective at reducing fracture risk and increasing BMD irrespective of diabetes status. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hip FracturesOsteoporosisBiphenyl CompoundsBone DensityDenosumabDiphosphonatesHumansBiphenyl CompoundsBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDiphosphonatesodanacatibANTIRESORPTIVESBIOCHEMICAL MARKERS OF BONE REMODELINGCLINICAL TRIALSDXAOSTEOPOROSIS

Identifiers

PMID36065588
PMCPMC10092457
OpenAlexW4294713060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.