Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2022
Diabetes Mellitus and the Benefit of Antiresorptive Therapy on Fracture Risk.
Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical characteristics of the reduced bone mineral density subgroup among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cross-sectional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Differences and similarities in cortical bone of the femur between donors with and without type 2 diabetes.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026Article
- Sex-specific associations between carotid plaque and bone mineral density in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Biology of sex differences · 2026Article
- How prevalent is osteoporosis in a high-risk subgroup? A multicenter study of postmenopausal women hospitalized for fractures in China.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Fracture and mortality outcomes by osteoporosis treatment route in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: a propensity-matched registry study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- 4. Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and Assessment of Comorbidities: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- Brazilian guidelines for the management of osteoporosis in diabetes mellitus.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Review
- Diabetic bone fragility through advanced glycation end product-collagen axis: Mechanisms and therapy of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.World journal of diabetes · 2025Review
- Prevalence and risk factors for osteoporosis in type 1 diabetes-results from an observational study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025Observational
- The effects of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus on bone health in chronic kidney disease.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2025Review
- Biases in the performance of FRAX without BMD in predicting fracture risk in a multiethnic population with diabetes: the Diabetes and Aging Study.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025Article
- Semaglutide promotes the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells through activation of the Wnt/LRP5/β-catenin signaling pathway.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- 4. Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and Assessment of Comorbidities: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.Diabetes care · 2025Review
- Zoledronic acid and denosumab are associated with similar fracture incidence and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- KIAA0753 enhances osteoblast differentiation suppressed by diabetes.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Bone metabolism in diabetes: a clinician's guide to understanding the bone-glucose interplay.Diabetologia · 2024Review
- IDEAL-IQ combined with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for quantitative diagnosis of osteoporosis.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Bone Health in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2024Article
- Links among Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Osteoporosis: Bone as a Target.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with increased risk of fractures. However, it is unclear whether current osteoporosis treatments reduce fractures in individuals with diabetes. The aim of the study was to determine whether presence of T2D influences the efficacy of antiresorptive treatment for osteoporosis using the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH)-American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)-Study to Advance Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as a Regulatory Endpoint (SABRE) cohort, which includes individual patient data from randomized trials of osteoporosis therapies. In this study we included 96,385 subjects, 6.8% of whom had T2D, from nine bisphosphonate trials, two selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) trials, two trials of menopausal hormone therapy, one denosumab trial, and one odanacatib trial. We used Cox regression to obtain the treatment hazard ratio (HR) for incident nonvertebral, hip, and all fractures and logistic regression to obtain the treatment odds ratio (OR) for incident morphometric vertebral fractures, separately for T2D and non-DM. We used linear regression to estimate the effect of treatment on 2-year change in BMD (n = 49,099) and 3-month to 12-month change in bone turnover markers (n = 12,701) by diabetes status. In all analyses, we assessed the interaction between treatment and diabetes status. In pooled analyses of all 15 trials, we found that diabetes did not impact treatment efficacy, with similar reductions in vertebral, nonvertebral, all, and hip fractures, increases in total hip and femoral neck BMD, and reductions in serum C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide (CTX), urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen/creatinine (NTX/Cr) and procollagen type 1 N propeptide (P1NP) (all interactions p > 0.05). We found similar results for the pooled analysis of bisphosphonate trials. However, when we considered trials individually, we found a few interactions within individual studies between diabetes status and the effects of denosumab and odanacatib on fracture risk, change in BMD or bone turnover markers (BTMs). In sum, these results provide strong evidence that bisphosphonates and most licensed antiresorptive drugs are effective at reducing fracture risk and increasing BMD irrespective of diabetes status. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.