ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2022
Modelling intramuscular drug fate
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical translation of injectable hydrogels: from bioactive polymers to long-acting drug delivery systems.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- Mechanistic Modeling of Intramuscular Administration of a Long-acting Injectable Accounting for Tissue Response At the Depot Site.The AAPS journal · 2025Article
- Effect of SiOACS omega · 2025Article
- Albumin Corona Overturns Long-Acting Behaviors of Myristic Acid-Conjugated Quetiapine Nanosuspension.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Development of a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to simulate the pharmacokinetics of intramuscular antiretroviral drugs.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024Article
- Perfusable Biohybrid Designs for Bioprinted Skeletal Muscle Tissue.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parenteral administrations are a mainstay of clinical drug delivery. Intramuscular (IM) injections deposit drug directly into skeletal muscle bellies, providing rapid systemic uptake due to the highly vascularized nature of this site. The potential to inject particulate or non-aqueous materials have also made IM injections useful for long-acting formulations. These attributes have supported a plethora of medicines being approved for IM administration. Despite these many approvals across multiple pharmaceutical categories, mechanisms that control drug release from the injection site, and thus its pharmacokinetic properties, remain poorly understood. Several pre-clinical
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.