Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36065389›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2022

Effectiveness and Safety of Vortioxetine for Major Depressive Disorder in Real-World Clinical Practice: Results from the Single-Arm RELIEVE China Study.

Gang Wang, Le Xiao, Hongye Ren, Kenneth Simonsen, Jingdong Ma, Xiangdong Xu, Ping Guo, Zhiren Wang, Ludong Bai, Elin Heldbo Reines and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gang Wang *The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Le Xiao *The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4323-036X
Hongye RenMedical Affairs, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0080-4765
Kenneth SimonsenMedical Affairs, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.
Jingdong MaMedical Affairs, Lundbeck China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9000-0001
Xiangdong XuDepartment of Psychiatry, Xinjiang Mental Health Center, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Ping GuoDepartment of Psychosomatic Disorders, The 3rd People's Hospital of Huzhou City, Huzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhiren WangDepartment of Science & Technology, Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8679-9495
Ludong BaiDepartment of Psychiatry, Shandong Mental Health Center, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Elin Heldbo ReinesMedical Affairs, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1151-9102
Lene Hammer-HelmichMedical Affairs, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8962-6250
Lundbeck (Denmark) · DKCapital Medical University · CNBeijing HuiLongGuan Hospital · CNShandong Mental Health Center · CNThird People's Hospital of Huzhou · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects >163 million people worldwide and is a leading cause of disability in China. Functional impairment occurs alongside cognitive symptoms, anxiety, and depression, reducing quality of life and productivity in patients with MDD. Purpose: The multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine has demonstrated efficacy in relieving depressive and functional symptoms of MDD in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The RELIEVE China study aimed to investigate the real-world effectiveness of vortioxetine in China. Patients and Methods: This was an observational, prospective cohort study in patients with MDD initiating treatment with vortioxetine at physician's discretion in China. Participants were followed up for 24 weeks and assessed at 3 time points: baseline, week 8, and week 24. The primary objective was to assess the change from baseline to weeks 8 and 24 in functional impairment as measured by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total score. Additional assessments included SDS subdomains, measures of depression severity, anxiety, and cognition. The safety and tolerability of vortioxetine were also examined. Results: In total, 859 patients were included in the analysis. A consistent and significant improvement in functional impairment was observed during the study, with baseline mean SDS total score (16.7 points) decreasing by 5.42 (SE, 0.22) and 8.71 (SE, 0.226) points at week 8 and week 24, respectively ( Conclusion: This study demonstrated the short- and long-term effectiveness and tolerability of vortioxetine for patients with MDD in a real-world setting in China. These findings are consistent with the efficacy and safety profile observed during RCTs.

Indexed as

Chinacognitionfunctioningmajor depressive disorderreal-world evidencevortioxetine

Identifiers

PMID36065389
PMCPMC9440675
OpenAlexW4293766356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.