ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Clinical Study of Different Treatment Methods for Tuberculous Pleuritis Complicated with Pleural Tuberculoma.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rare concurrent extrapulmonary tuberculous pericarditis and pleuritis accompanied with lung silicosis.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2024Article
- Retracted: Clinical Study of Different Treatment Methods for Tuberculous Pleuritis Complicated with Pleural Tuberculoma.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-28Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and adverse drug reactions of four different schemes in the treatment of pleural tuberculoma. Methods: A total of 120 patients with pleural tuberculoma admitted to the Tuberculosis Department of our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were selected as the research subjects. According to different treatment methods, the patients were divided into four groups, with 30 cases in each group. They were as follows: group A received classical HRZE regimen, group B received HRZE+pleural injection, group C received HZE+rifabutin, and group D received HZE+rifabutin+pleural injection. All patients were treated intensively for 3 months and then consolidated treatment for 6 months according to the patient's condition. The absorption of lesions in the four groups at different time was compared, and the occurrences of adverse drug reactions and treatment outcomes during treatment were recorded. Results: After 3 months of treatment, compared with groups A, B, and C, the number of significantly absorbed cases and effective cases in group D increased, while the number of invalid cases decreased. However, there was no statistical significance in the absorption of lesions between the four groups ( Conclusions: HZE+rifabutin+pleural injection against tuberculosis therapy has a significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of pleural tuberculoma, which can more effectively improve the clinical symptoms of patients, improve the efficacy, and reduce complications, with a good prognosis, worthy of clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.