Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36065354›Full record

Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Safety and Efficacy of a New Water Gradient Biomimetic Monthly Replacement Spherical Contact Lens Material (Lehfilcon A).

Gina Wesley, Brad Giedd, Bradley Hines, Katherine Bickle, Christopher Pearson, Holly Lorentz

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Evaluation of CelligentDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gina WesleyComplete Eye Care of Medina, Hamel, MN, USA.
Brad GieddKindred Optics at Maitland Vision, Maitland, FL, USA.
Bradley HinesOptometry Group, Memphis, TN, USA.
Katherine BickleProCare Vision Center, Granville, OH, USA.
Christopher PearsonOMEGA Vision Center PA, Longwood, FL, USA.
Holly LorentzAlcon Research, LLC, Johns Creek, GA, USA.
Alcon (United States) · USComplete Eye Care of Medina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of the investigational lens, lehfilcon A, when worn in a daily wear modality and replaced monthly as compared to the commercially available comfilcon A contact lens. Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, controlled, double-masked, randomized, parallel-group clinical study with bilateral lens wear for 3 months. In all, 115 subjects completed the study (77 with test lehfilcon A and 38 with control comfilcon A contact lenses). Distance visual acuity (VA) was assessed using Snellen VA. Lens performance was assessed by examining lens fit/movement, centration, front surface wettability and front/back surface deposits using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Results: At the 3-month follow-up visit, all eyes had a distance VA of 20/20 or better. Further, lens fit/movement was assessed as optimal in 92.9% of the eyes with lehfilcon A and 89.2% with comfilcon A. There were no ratings of unacceptably tight or loose fits for either contact lens material. Lens centration was assessed as optimal in 98.7% of eyes with lehfilcon A and 94.6% with comfilcon A. For front and back surface deposits, both materials showed minimal lens surface deposits. Front surface wettability was assessed as grade 0 or 1 for most of the study lenses in both lens groups across all attended study visits. There were no ocular adverse events related to the study lenses. Conclusion: Overall, lehfilcon A showed excellent VA, optimal lens fitting characteristics, a clean surface, high wettability, and low risk for adverse events after 3 months of lens wear.

Indexed as

biomimeticcomfilcon Acontact lenslehfilcon Avisual acuitywater gradient

Identifiers

PMID36065354
PMCPMC9440676
OpenAlexW4293797814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.