Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36065154›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2023

What are the research priorities for optimising the safe and effective use of opioids in Australian general practice?

Monica Jung, Helena Cangadis-Douglass, Suzanne Nielsen, Samanta Lalic, Malcolm Dobbin, Grant Russell, Pallavi Prathivadi, Pene Wood, Elizabeth Manias, Cik Y Lee and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Monica JungMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6458-1279
Helena Cangadis-DouglassMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Suzanne NielsenMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5341-1055
Samanta LalicCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7055-3626
Malcolm DobbinDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Grant RussellDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Pallavi PrathivadiDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Pene WoodDepartment of Pharmacy and Biomedical Science, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.
Elizabeth ManiasSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Cik Y LeeCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Carolyn ArnoldCaulfield Pain Management and Research Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Megan KuleasPainaustralia, Canberra, Australia.
Jennifer L SchumannMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jenni IlomäkiCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
J Simon BellMonash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Eastern Health · AUMonash University · AUGeneral Department of Preventive Medicine · VNCaulfield Hospital · AUEnergyAustralia (Australia) · AULa Trobe University · AUMonash Health · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

SB is the recipient of an National Health and Medical Research Council Dementia Leadership Fellowship 1140298SN in the recipient of an National Health and Medical Research Council Research Fellowship 1163961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPersistent high rates of prescription opioid use and harms remain a concern in Australia, Europe and North America. Research priority setting can inform the research agenda, strategic responses and evidence-based interventions. The objective of this study was to establish research priorities related to the safe and effective use of prescription opioids in general practice.

methodsConsumers, clinicians and policy makers were invited to participate in a structured consensus workshop in May 2021. A modified nominal group technique was used to explore research priorities for the safe and effective use of opioids in Australian general practice. Research priorities were identified, consolidated and prioritised using a structured process.

resultsSeventeen consumer, medical, pharmacy, nursing, allied health and policy participants generated 26 consolidated priorities across three domains: (i) consumer-focused priorities; (ii) clinician and practice-focused priorities; and (iii) system and policy-focused priorities. The highest ranked research priorities in each of the domains were consumer characteristics that influence opioid prescribing and outcomes, opioid deprescribing strategies, and system-level barriers to prescribing alternatives to opioids, in the consumer, clinician and practice, and system and policy domains, respectively. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThe priorities reflect opportunities for research priority setting within Australian general practice. The priorities provide a map for future qualitative and quantitative research that will inform safe and effective opioid prescribing.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidGeneral PracticeAustraliaHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'ResearchAnalgesics, OpioidAustraliaconsensusgeneral practiceopioidresearch

Identifiers

PMID36065154
PMCPMC10946507
OpenAlexW4294808363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.