Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36065098›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2022

Evaluating a partnership model of hospice enabled dementia care: A three-phased monitoring, focus group and interview study.

Dorry McLaughlin, Felicity Hasson, Joanne Reid, Kevin Brazil, Lesley Rutherford, Carol Stone, Jenny T van der Steen, Joanne Ballentine

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorry McLaughlinSchool of Nursing and Midwifery & Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2889-9842
Felicity HassonInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8200-9732
Joanne ReidSchool of Nursing and Midwifery & Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5820-862X
Kevin BrazilSchool of Nursing and Midwifery & Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Lesley RutherfordSchool of Nursing and Midwifery & Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Carol StoneBelfast Health and Social Care Trust, Marie Curie Hospice, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Jenny T van der SteenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9063-7501
Joanne BallentineNorthern Ireland Hospice, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Queen's University Belfast · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with dementia and their caregivers often lack equitable access to hospice care which is a concern internationally. Domains of best practice in palliative care for this population exist and hospices are urged to become dementia friendly.

aimThis study aimed to evaluate the model of 'Hospice Enabled Dementia Partnership' mapped to international domains of best practice.

designThree-phased monitoring, group interview and individual interview study using a formative evaluation framework. SETTINGPARTICIPANTS: The partnership model was a collaboration between a large specialist palliative care hospice, a dementia charity and a Health Care Trust in the United Kingdom. Service documents were subjected to documentary review of monitoring activity and key indicators of service success. Group interviews and individual interviews took place with family carers (

resultsOne hundred people with dementia were referred to the service between May 2016 and December 2017. Thirty-eight of the 42 people who died, achieved their preferred place of care and died at home. Four themes were derived from the data 'Impact of Dementia', 'Value of the Service', 'Information and Learning Needs' and 'Working in Partnership'.

conclusionsPositive outcomes resulted from this best practice model; achievement of preferred place of care and death at home, dual benefits of therapies for patients and families and partnership in cross working and learning between services. Replication of this model should be considered internationally.

Indexed as

DementiaHospice CareHospicesFocus GroupsHumansQualitative Researchcaregiversdementiafocus groupsHospiceinterview

Identifiers

PMID36065098
PMCPMC9606481
OpenAlexW4294833785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.