Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064986›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2023

Effect of neuromuscular reversal with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate versus sugammadex on postoperative ileus following colorectal surgery.

L Traeger, T D Hall, S Bedrikovetski, H M Kroon, N N Dudi-Venkata, J W Moore, T Sammour

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L TraegerColorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. luke.traeger@sa.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0327-7334
T D HallDepartment of Anaesthesia, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
S BedrikovetskiColorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9330-625X
H M KroonColorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8923-7527
N N Dudi-VenkataColorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9775-3599
J W MooreColorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
T SammourColorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4918-8871
Royal Adelaide Hospital · AUFlinders Medical Centre · AU

Funding

Royal Adelaide Hospital Colorectal Research GroupRoyal Adelaide Hospital Dawes ScholarshipUniversity of Adelaide a1175080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication following colorectal surgery and is mediated in part by the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAIP). Neostigmine (acetylcholinesterase inhibitor), co-administered with glycopyrrolate, is frequently given for neuromuscular reversal before tracheal extubation and modulates the CAIP. An alternative reversal agent, sugammadex (selective rocuronium or vecuronium binder), acts independently from the CAIP. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of neuromuscular reversal agents used during anaesthesia on gastrointestinal recovery.

methodsThree hundred thirty-five patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at the Royal Adelaide Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was GI-2, a validated composite measure of time to diet tolerance and passage of stool. Demographics, 30-day complications and length of stay were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

resultsTwo hundred twenty-four (66.9%) patients (129 [57.6%] males and 95 [42.4%] females, median age 64 [19-90] years) received neostigmine/glycopyrrolate and 111 (33.1%) received sugammadex (62 [55.9%] males and 49 [44.1%] females, median age 67 [18-94] years). Sugammadex patients achieved GI-2 sooner after surgery (median 3 (0-10) vs. 3 (0-12) days, p = 0.036), and reduced time to first stool (median 2 (0-10) vs. 3 (0-12) days, p = 0.035). Rates of POI, complications and length of stay were similar. On univariate analysis, POI was associated with smoking history, previous abdominal surgery, colostomy formation, increased opioid use and postoperative hypokalaemia (p < 0.05). POI was associated with increased complications, including anastomotic leak and prolonged hospital stay (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, neostigmine, bowel anastomoses and increased postoperative opioid use (p < 0.05) remained predictive of time to GI-2.

conclusionsPatients who received sugammadex had a reduced time to achieving first stool and GI-2. Neostigmine use, bowel anastomoses and postoperative opioid use were associated with delayed time to achieving GI-2.

Indexed as

GlycopyrrolateIleusNeostigmineNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsSugammadexAcetylcholinesteraseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuromuscular BlockadePostoperative ComplicationsAcetylcholinesteraseAnalgesics, OpioidGlycopyrrolateNeostigmineNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsSugammadexAcetylcholinesterase inhibitorColorectal surgeryGI-2GlycopyrrolateIleusNeostigmineSugammadex

Identifiers

PMID36064986
PMCPMC9898426
OpenAlexW4294631136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.