Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064983›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2022

Interventions and methods to prepare, educate or familiarise children and young people for radiological procedures: a scoping review.

Lucy Bray, Lisa Booth, Victoria Gray, Michelle Maden, Jill Thompson, Holly Saron

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Influence of Patient-Centered Communication on Children's Anxiety and Use of Anesthesia for MR.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucy BrayFaculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Child Health Literacy, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK. brayl@edgehill.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8414-3233
Lisa BoothInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Cumbria, Cumbria, UK.
Victoria GrayAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Michelle MadenUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jill ThompsonDivision of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Sciences School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Holly SaronFaculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Child Health Literacy, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children attending hospital for radiological procedures can experience uncertainty, anxiety and distress; this can result in sub-optimal experiences for children, poor scan quality and the need for radiological procedures to be rescheduled or sedation to be used. The preparation and education of children before clinical procedures has been shown to have a positive influence on procedural outcomes. This scoping review aimed to locate and examine the evidence relating to non-invasive interventions and methods to prepare, educate and familiarise children for radiological procedures within a healthcare setting. A comprehensive search strategy identified 36 articles. A narrative synthesis approach was adopted to make sense of the key findings. Studies investigated a range of radiological procedures (MRI, plain radiographs, CT, fluoroscopy and Micturating cystourethrogram) using a wide range of interventions (smartphone applications, storybooks, videos, mock scanners) which varied by method, mode of delivery and target audience. The outcomes used to evaluate the value and impact of the interventions are wide, varied and inconsistently applied making it difficult to judge which interventions offer the optimal impact on scan quality, scan completion and children's experiences. This review highlights that there is a need to further understand which specific elements of the non-invasive interventions 'work best' for children. There is a need for consistency on the outcomes measured and for these measures to include child-centred outcomes alongside scan quality and length of radiological procedure.

Indexed as

ChildrenPreparationRadiological proceduresScoping review

Identifiers

PMID36064983
PMCPMC9445139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.