Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064956›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Hinfluences severe disease-mediated population declines in two of the most common garden bird species in Great Britain.

Hugh J Hanmer, Andrew A Cunningham, Shinto K John, Shaheed K Magregor, Robert A Robinson, Katharina Seilern-Moy, Gavin M Siriwardena, Becki Lawson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Complete mitochondrial genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hugh J HanmerBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU, UK. hugh.hanmer@bto.org.
Andrew A CunninghamInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.
Shinto K JohnInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.
Shaheed K MagregorInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.
Robert A RobinsonBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU, UK.
Katharina Seilern-MoyInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.
Gavin M SiriwardenaBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU, UK.
Becki LawsonInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK. becki.lawson@ioz.ac.uk.
Zoological Society of London · GBBritish Trust for Ornithology · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence of supplementary feeding of wildlife on disease transmission and its consequent impacts on population dynamics are underappreciated. In Great Britain, supplementary feeding is hypothesised to have enabled the spread of the protozoan parasite, Trichomonas gallinae, from columbids to finches, leading to epidemic finch trichomonosis and a rapid population decline of greenfinch (Chloris chloris). More recently, chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs), has also declined markedly from the second to fifth commonest bird in Britain. Using citizen science data, we show that both declines were driven primarily by reduced adult survival, with the greatest reductions occurring in peri-domestic habitats, where supplementary food provision is common. Post-mortem examinations showed a proportional increase in chaffinch trichomonosis cases, near-contemporaneous with its population decline. Like greenfinches, chaffinches often use supplementary food, but are less associated with human habitation. Our results support the hypothesis that supplementary feeding can increase parasite transmission frequency within and between common species. However, the dynamics behind resultant population change can vary markedly, highlighting the need for integrating disease surveillance with demographic monitoring. Other species susceptible to T. gallinae infection may also be at risk. Supplementary feeding guidelines for wildlife should include disease mitigation strategies to ensure that benefits to target species outweigh risks.

Indexed as

Bird DiseasesFinchesTrichomonasTrichomonas InfectionsAnimalsAnimals, WildHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID36064956
PMCPMC9445085
OpenAlexW4294612974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.