ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2022
[Interdisciplinary and interprofessional communication in intensive and emergency care].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychosocial risk factors at work: perspectives of master's and doctoral students working in the health sector.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2025Article
- [Internal and external interfaces in the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to acuteness, time constraints, and psychological pressure as well as changing team compositions, professional communication constitutes a key challenge in the treatment of critically ill patients.
objectivesThe aim of this narrative review is to present the current literature on clinical relevance and current developments of interdisciplinary and interprofessional communication in intensive care and emergency medicine.
resultsEffective communication is of great importance in intensive care and emergency medicine, both for ensuring high-quality patient care and work satisfaction as well as mental health of the medical practitioners. Most conflicts occur between the medical and nursing staff, with communicative conflicts predominantly being related to discussions about the patient's prognosis and end-of-life decision-making. Structural measures such as regular team meetings and trainings seem suitable to specifically improve communication. However, the topic is commonly inadequately represented in everyday clinical practice as well as in research.
conclusionsEven though the importance of interprofessional and interdisciplinary communication for high-quality patient care and workload reduction is increasingly being recognized, its routine application in everyday clinical practice is still scarce, particularly in intensive care and emergency medicine. Due to the specific structure and patient population of these fields of patient care, they can benefit more than other specialties from targeted measures to improve communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.