Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064819›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2022

Coping with high advertising exposure: a source-monitoring perspective.

Raoul Bell, Laura Mieth, Axel Buchner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raoul BellDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. raoul.bell@hhu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0592-0362
Laura MiethDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9791-7269
Axel BuchnerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4529-3444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumers are exposed to large amounts of advertising every day. One way to avoid being manipulated is to monitor the sources of persuasive messages. In the present study it was tested whether high exposure to advertising affects the memory and guessing processes underlying source attributions. Participants were exposed to high or low proportions of advertising messages that were intermixed with product statements from a trustworthy source. In a subsequent memory test, participants had to remember the sources of these statements. In Experiments 1 and 2, high advertising exposure led to increased source memory and decreased recognition of the statements in comparison to low advertising exposure. High advertising exposure also induced an increased tendency toward guessing that statements whose sources were not remembered came from advertising. The results of Experiment 3 suggest that the presence of advertising, relative to its absence, leads to a skeptical guessing bias. Being exposed to advertising thus has pronounced effects on the memory and guessing processes underlying source attributions. These changes in source monitoring can be interpreted as coping mechanisms that serve to protect against the persuasive influence of advertising messages.

Indexed as

AdvertisingRecognition, PsychologyAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansMental RecallPersuasive CommunicationAdvertising exposureConsumer skepticismSource credibilitySource memorySource-monitoring framework

Identifiers

PMID36064819
PMCPMC9444107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.