Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064774›Full record

ArticleNature methods2022

The EQIPD framework for rigor in the design, conduct, analysis and documentation of animal experiments.

Jan Vollert, Malcolm Macleod, Ulrich Dirnagl, Martien J Kas, Martin C Michel, Heidrun Potschka, Gernot Riedel, Kimberley E Wever, Hanno Würbel, Thomas Steckler and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Effects of a proprietary mixture of extracts fromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jan VollertPain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. j.vollert@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0733-5201
Malcolm MacleodCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9187-9839
Ulrich DirnaglDepartment of Experimental Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0755-6119
Martien J KasGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4471-8618
Martin C MichelPartnership for Assessment and Accreditation of Scientific Practice, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidrun PotschkaInstitute of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1506-0252
Gernot RiedelInstitute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Kimberley E WeverSystematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation, Department for Health Evidence, Nijmegen Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3635-3660
Hanno WürbelDivision of Animal Welfare, VPH Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2934-3010
Thomas StecklerJanssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
EQIPD Consortium
Andrew S C RicePain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Animal ExperimentationAnimalsDocumentationResearch Design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.