Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064667›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Intranasal vaccination induced cross-protective secretory IgA antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants with reducing the potential risk of lung eosinophilic immunopathology.

Takuya Hemmi, Akira Ainai, Takao Hashiguchi, Minoru Tobiume, Takayuki Kanno, Naoko Iwata-Yoshikawa, Shun Iida, Yuko Sato, Sho Miyamoto, Akira Ueno and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Expression of FMD virus-like particles in yeastJournal of veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Takuya HemmiDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Biological Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira AinaiDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Biological Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: ainai@niid.go.jp.
Takao HashiguchiLaboratory of Medical Virology, Institute for Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Minoru TobiumeDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki KannoDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoko Iwata-YoshikawaDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Shun IidaDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko SatoDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Sho MiyamotoDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira UenoDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Life Science and Medical Bioscience, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaori SanoDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinji SaitoDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Nozomi Shiwa-SudoDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriyo NagataDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji TamuraDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryosuke SuzukiDepartment of Virology II, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Biological Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki HasegawaResearch Center for Influenza and Respiratory Virus, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Tadaki SuzukiDepartment of Pathology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
National Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPTokyo University of Science · JPKyushu University · JPWaseda University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is a need to develop vaccines to prevent infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants. One candidate is a nasal vaccine capable of inducing secretory IgA antibodies in the mucosa of the upper respiratory tract, the initial site of infection. However, regarding the development of COVID-19 vaccines, there is concern about the potential risk of inducing lung eosinophilic immunopathology as a vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease as a result of the T helper 2 (Th2)-dominant adaptive immune response. In this study, we investigated the protective effect against virus infection induced by intranasal vaccination of recombinant trimeric spike protein derived from SARS-CoV-2 adjuvanted with CpG oligonucleotides, ODN2006, in mouse model. The intranasal vaccine combined with ODN2006 successfully induced not only systemic spike-specific IgG antibodies, but also secretory IgA antibodies in the nasal mucosa. Secretory IgA antibodies showed high protective ability against SARS-CoV-2 variants (Alpha, Beta and Gamma variants) compared to IgG antibodies in the serum. The nasal vaccine of this formulation induced a high number of IFN-γ-secreting cells in the draining cervical lymph nodes and a lower spike-specific IgG1/IgG2a ratio compared to that of subcutaneous vaccination with alum as a typical Th2 adjuvant. These features are consistent with the induction of the Th1 adaptive immune response. In addition, mice intranasally vaccinated with ODN2006 showed less lung eosinophilic immunopathology after viral challenge than mice subcutaneously vaccinated with alum adjuvant. Our findings indicate that intranasal vaccine adjuvanted with ODN2006 could be a candidate that can prevent the infection of antigenically different variant viruses, reducing the risk of vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntranasalAlum CompoundsAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunoglobulin A, SecretoryImmunoglobulin GLungMiceOligonucleotidesSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAdjuvants, ImmunologicAlum Compoundsaluminum sulfateAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin A, SecretoryImmunoglobulin GOligonucleotidesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2COVID-19Intranasal vaccinationLung eosinophilic immunopathologySARS-CoV-2secretory IgA antibody

Identifiers

PMID36064667
PMCPMC9439873
OpenAlexW4293216799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.