Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064570›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2022

Interest of phenomic prediction as an alternative to genomic prediction in grapevine.

Charlotte Brault, Juliette Lazerges, Agnès Doligez, Miguel Thomas, Martin Ecarnot, Pierre Roumet, Yves Bertrand, Gilles Berger, Thierry Pons, Pierre François and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring intra-varietal variation for complex traits in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Harnessing clonal diversity in grapevine: from genomic insights to modern breeding applications.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genomic prediction for yield and malting traits in barley using metabolomic and near-infrared spectra.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Charlotte BraultUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, 34398, France.
Juliette LazergesUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, 34398, France.
Agnès DoligezUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, 34398, France.
Miguel ThomasUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, 34398, France.
Martin EcarnotUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, 34398, France.
Pierre RoumetUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, 34398, France.
Yves BertrandUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, 34398, France.
Gilles BergerUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, 34398, France.
Thierry PonsUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, 34398, France.
Pierre FrançoisUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, 34398, France.
Loïc Le CunffUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, 34398, France.
Patrice ThisUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, 34398, France.
Vincent SeguraUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier, Montpellier, 34398, France. vincent.segura@inrae.fr.

Funding

Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie 2018/0577Ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation CASDAR, C 2020-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhenomic prediction has been defined as an alternative to genomic prediction by using spectra instead of molecular markers. A reflectance spectrum provides information on the biochemical composition within a tissue, itself being under genetic determinism. Thus, a relationship matrix built from spectra could potentially capture genetic signal. This new methodology has been mainly applied in several annual crop species but little is known so far about its interest in perennial species. Besides, phenomic prediction has only been tested for a restricted set of traits, mainly related to yield or phenology. This study aims at applying phenomic prediction for the first time in grapevine, using spectra collected on two tissues and over two consecutive years, on two populations and for 15 traits, related to berry composition, phenology, morphological and vigour. A major novelty of this study was to collect spectra and phenotypes several years apart from each other. First, we characterized the genetic signal in spectra and under which condition it could be maximized, then phenomic predictive ability was compared to genomic predictive ability.

resultsFor the first time, we showed that the similarity between spectra and genomic relationship matrices was stable across tissues or years, but variable across populations, with co-inertia around 0.3 and 0.6 for diversity panel and half-diallel populations, respectively. Applying a mixed model on spectra data increased phenomic predictive ability, while using spectra collected on wood or leaves from one year or another had less impact. Differences between populations were also observed for predictive ability of phenomic prediction, with an average of 0.27 for the diversity panel and 0.35 for the half-diallel. For both populations, a significant positive correlation was found across traits between predictive ability of genomic and phenomic predictions.

conclusionNIRS is a new low-cost alternative to genotyping for predicting complex traits in perennial species such as grapevine. Having spectra and phenotypes from different years allowed us to exclude genotype-by-environment interactions and confirms that phenomic prediction can rely only on genetics.

Indexed as

Genomic predictionGrapevinePhenomic predictionPhenomicsPlant breedingSpectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID36064570
PMCPMC9442960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.