Observational studyScientific reports2022
Real-world effectiveness of anti-interleukin-23 antibodies in chronic plaque-type psoriasis of patients from the Austrian Psoriasis Registry (PsoRA).
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of real-world evidence from patient registries for psoriasis in decision-making: a systematic review.BMJ open quality · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Real-World Benefit of Tildrakizumab for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Review
- Tildrakizumab Treatment Patterns in Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Retrospective Analysis From the Canadian Patient Support Program.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Article
- Real-world Cost per Responder Among Different Classes of Biologics for the Treatment of Psoriasis.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
- Predictors of treatment survival in patients with plaque psoriasis treated with phototherapy: registry analysis.Skin health and disease · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Patients with Psoriasis Showing Suboptimal Response to Secukinumab or Ixekizumab: Results from a Phase 3b, Open-Label, Single-Arm (aIMM) Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2024Article
- A 3-Year Experience with Tildrakizumab Treatment for Patients with Plaque Psoriasis in Clinical Practice.Dermatology and therapy · 2024Article
- Psoriasis as a Systemic Disease.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024Review
- Psoriasis and its impact on close relatives and partners of patients - A cross-sectional questionnaire study.Skin health and disease · 2024Article
- Sensory neurons: An integrated component of innate immunity.Immunity · 2024Review
- Effectiveness and Safety After a Switch to Tildrakizumab: A Real World Multicenter Italian Study in Psoriasis.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023Article
- Suspected oncologic adverse reactions associated with interleukin-23 inhibitors in EudraVigilance: Comparative study and gender distribution.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2023Article
- Risankizumab Therapy for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis-A Multi-Center, Long-Term, Real-Life Study from Poland.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The optimal use of tildrakizumab in the elderly via improvement of Treg function and its preventive effect of psoriatic arthritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Real-World Effectiveness of Tildrakizumab for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis in Canada.Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the introduction of the latest class of biologic drugs targeting interleukin (IL)-23p19, three new, highly effective drugs can be used for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. However, poorer skin improvement as well as higher rates of serious adverse events have been reported for patients under real-world conditions (outside clinical trials). This accounts especially for patients who have already been treated with biologic drugs. We therefore aimed to determine effectiveness and safety of IL-23p19 inhibitors in real-world patients by analysing data from the Psoriasis Registry Austria (PsoRA) in this observational, retrospective, multicentre cohort study. Data for 197 patients (52.3% biologic-non-naïve), who were treated with anti-IL-23p19 antibodies (127 guselkumab, 55 risankizumab and 15 tildrakizumab) for at least 3 months, were eligible for analysis. In general, biologic-non-naïve patients displayed a less favourable response to anti-IL-23 treatment as compared to biologic-naïve patients. However, after correction for previous biologic exposure, few differences in PASI improvement were detected among biologic-naïve and -non-naïve patients treated with different IL-23p19 inhibitors. This indicates that treatment effectiveness is not related to the class of the previously administered therapy in biologic-non-naïve patients. Therefore, IL-23p19 inhibitors represent a promising treatment alternative for patients who have not responded to previous biologics. However, as with other biologic agents (including IL-17 inhibitors), we did not observe an entirely satisfactory treatment response (i.e. PASI < 3 and/or PASI 75) to anti-IL-23 treatment in one out of four to five patients. Adverse events (mainly non-severe infections) were observed in 23 (11.7%) patients with no major differences regarding the administered IL-23 inhibitor or previous biologic exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.