Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064553›Full record

Articlenpj aging2022

Why do older adults stand-up differently to young adults?: investigation of compensatory movement strategies in sit-to-walk.

Eline van der Kruk, Paul Strutton, Louis J Koizia, Michael Fertleman, Peter Reilly, Anthony M J Bull

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical and biomechanical biomarkers of altered functional transitions in lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Eline van der KrukBiomechatronics & Human-Machine control, Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering (3me), Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. e.vanderkruk@tudelft.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6933-0313
Paul StruttonThe Nick Davey lab, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5202-099X
Louis J KoiziaCutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Michael FertlemanCutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4023-1156
Peter ReillyMusculoskeletal Mechanics group, Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anthony M J BullMusculoskeletal Mechanics group, Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4473-8264
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) 019.173EN.023Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) 18145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional motor redundancy enables humans to move with distinct muscle activation patterns while achieving a similar outcome. Since humans select similar strategies, there seems to be an optimal control. However, older adults move differently to young adults. The question is whether this is this due to an altered reinforcement scheme, altered sensory inputs, or due to alterations in the neuromusculoskeletal systems, so that it is no longer optimal or possible to execute the same movement strategies. The aim of this study was to analyse natural compensation strategies in the vital daily-life-task, sit-to-walk, in relation to neuromuscular capacity and movement objectives in younger (27.2 ± 4.6 years, N = 27, 14♀) and elderly (75.9 ± 6.3 years, N = 23, 12♀) adults. Aspects of the neuromuscular system that are prone to age-related decline and feasible to quantify were assessed (i.e. strength, nerve conductivity, fear of falling). Kinematics and muscle activity were recorded and joint kinetics were estimated using biomechanical models. Elderly men consistently used their arms when standing up. This strategy was not associated with a lack of or a reduction in strength, but with a reduction, but no lack of, ankle joint range of motion, and with increased fear of falling. The results show that humans preferentially maintain a minimum threshold of neuromuscular reserve to cope with uncertainties which results in compensation prior to coming up against physical limitations. Smaller base of support while standing up, a compensatory strategy with possibly greater risk of falls, was associated with muscular weakness, and longer nerve conduction latencies.

Identifiers

PMID36064553
PMCPMC9445096
OpenAlexW4294725067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.