Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064489›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation for Concussion Recovery (i-RECOveR): protocol of an investigator-blinded, randomised, case series with multiple baseline design to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a 12-week treatment for persistent post-concussion symptoms.

Jack V K Nguyen, Adam McKay, Jennie Ponsford, Katie Davies, Michael Makdissi, Sean P A Drummond, Jonathan Reyes, Catherine Willmott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jack V K NguyenTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, GPO Box 1449, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia.
Adam McKayTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, GPO Box 1449, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia.
Jennie PonsfordTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, GPO Box 1449, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia.
Katie DaviesNeurological Rehabilitation Group, Melbourne, Australia.
Michael MakdissiOlympic Park Sports Medicine Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Sean P A DrummondTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, GPO Box 1449, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia.
Jonathan ReyesTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, GPO Box 1449, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia.
Catherine WillmottTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, GPO Box 1449, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia. Catherine.willmott@afl.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8517-9035
Australian Football League · AUEpworth Hospital · AUMonash University · AUMental Health Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUp to 25% of concussed individuals experience persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCSs) which may interfere with the return to pre-injury activities and cause significant stress. Given that multiple etiological factors are thought to contribute to PPCSs, an interdisciplinary approach is recommended. This pilot study aims to primarily investigate the feasibility of a novel interdisciplinary treatment for PPCSs. Given this intervention is novel, uncertainty exists in terms of potential recruitment and retention rates, adverse events, and treatment adherence and fidelity. These factors will be explored to inform the feasibility of a phase-2 randomised controlled trial. Preliminary efficacy of this intervention will also be explored.

methodsFifteen individuals with mild traumatic brain injury and PPCSs will receive up to 12 weeks of interdisciplinary treatments including psychology, physiotherapy, and medical interventions. Primary feasibility outcomes including data on recruitment and retention rates and treatment adherence will be explored descriptively. The cognitive therapy rating scale will be used to assess treatment fidelity. A single-case series with multiple baseline design will be used to explore preliminary efficacy. Participants will be randomly assigned to baseline phases of 2, 4, or 6 weeks. Regarding patient-centred secondary outcomes, the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire will be assessed three times a week during baseline and treatment phases. Secondary outcomes also include measures of mood, sleep and fatigue, physical functioning, return to activity, and health-related quality of life. Patient-centred outcomes will be assessed at baseline, pretreatment, post-treatment, and one- and three-month follow-up. Thematic analysis of participant experiences will be explored through qualitative interviews. DISCUSSION: Results from this trial will inform the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of this interdisciplinary concussion intervention and whether proceeding to a future definitive phase-2 randomised controlled trial is worthwhile. Understanding the end-user perspective of the treatment will also enable modifications to the treatment protocol for future trials to best suit the needs of individuals with PPCSs after mTBI. Outcomes from this trial can be directly translated into community rehabilitation programmes.

trial registrationANZCTR, ACTRN12620001111965. Registered 27 October 2020, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379118.

Indexed as

ConcussionInterdisciplinaryMild traumatic brain injuryRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36064489
PMCPMC9441831
OpenAlexW4294586759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.