Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064454›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2022

Development and implementation of an online community as a strategy for mixed methods research during a pandemic.

Lisa Shea, Jennifer Bushen, Nina Ahmad, Gabrielle Geonnotti, Joy LaMori, Stephanie Terrey, Pepa Gonzalez, Jill Shuman

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa SheaJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 800 Ridgeview Drive, Horsham, PA, 19044, USA. lshea4@ITS.JNJ.com.
Jennifer BushenJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Nina AhmadJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Gabrielle GeonnottiJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 800 Ridgeview Drive, Horsham, PA, 19044, USA.
Joy LaMoriJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 800 Ridgeview Drive, Horsham, PA, 19044, USA.
Stephanie TerreyCorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA.
Pepa GonzalezCorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA.
Jill ShumanCorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA.
Janssen (United States) · USNavitas Systems (United States) · USJanssen Scientific Affairs (United States)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conducting mixed methods research is critical for healthcare researchers to understand attitudes, behaviors, and experiences on health-related topics, such as vaccine acceptance. As the COVID-19 pandemic has made it difficult to employ traditional, face-to-face qualitative methodologies, this paper describes the use of a virtual platform to conduct person-centered research. To overcome these challenges and better understand the attitudes and behaviors of vaccine-eligible individuals in the United States, an online health community called the Virtual Engagement Research Community (VERC) was designed and implemented. Using the Health Belief Model as a framework, the VERC employed a mixed methods approach to elicit insights, which included discussion topics, rapid polls, and surveys. Throughout the initial enrollment period of April-October 2021, continuous improvement efforts were made to bolster recruitment and member engagement. This agile research strategy was successful in utilizing mixed methods to capture community sentiments regarding vaccines. While this community focused on vaccination, the methodology holds promise for other areas of health research such as obesity, HIV, mental health disorders, and diabetes.

Indexed as

Mixed methodsOnline health communityPandemicQualitative researchVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36064454
PMCPMC9442570
OpenAlexW4294613194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.