Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064434›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT2 protocol: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, multicenter trial in healthy subjects to investigate the effects of lacosamide, pregabalin, and tapentadol on biomarkers of pain processing observed by non-invasive neurophysiological measurements of human spinal cord and brainstem activity.

Caterina Leone, Giulia Di Stefano, Giuseppe Di Pietro, Petra Bloms-Funke, Irmgard Boesl, Ombretta Caspani, Sonya C Chapman, Nanna Brix Finnerup, Luis Garcia-Larrea, Tom Li and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Caterina Leone *Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. caterinamaria.leone@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8828-361X
Giulia Di Stefano *Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe Di PietroDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Petra Bloms-FunkeTranslational Science & Intelligence, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Irmgard BoeslClinical Science Development, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Ombretta CaspaniDepartment of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Sonya C ChapmanNeuroscience Next Generation Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Innovation Center, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nanna Brix FinnerupDanish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Luis Garcia-LarreaLyon Neurosciences Center Research Unit Inserm U 1028, Pierre Wertheimer Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
Tom LiTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Petah Tikva, Israel.
Marcus GoetzMRC Systems GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
André MourauxInstitute of Neuroscience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Bernhard PelzMRC Systems GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Esther Pogatzki-ZahnDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Andreas SchilderDepartment of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Erik SchnetterUniversity Computing Centre, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karin SchubartConsulTech GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Irene TraceyWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Inaki F TroconizDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Hans Van NielMature Products Development, Grünenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Jose Miguel Vela HernandezWelab Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Katy VincentNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health (NDWRH), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jan VollertDepartment of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Vishvarani WanigasekeraWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Matthias WittayerDepartment of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Keith G Phillips *Neuroscience Next Generation Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Innovation Center, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Andrea Truini *Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Rolf-Detlef Treede *Department of Neurophysiology, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences (MCTN), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DESapienza University of Rome · ITGrünenthal Group (Germany) · DEUniversity of Oxford · GBEli Lilly (United States) · USAarhus University · DKEsteve Química (Spain) · ESTeva Pharmaceuticals (Israel) · ILUniversidad de Navarra · ESUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 777500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT2 is one of four similarly designed clinical studies aiming at profiling a set of functional biomarkers of drug effects on specific compartments of the nociceptive system that could serve to accelerate the future development of analgesics. IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT2 will focus on human spinal cord and brainstem activity using biomarkers derived from non-invasive neurophysiological measurements.

methodsThis is a multisite, single-dose, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-period, 4-way crossover, pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) study in healthy subjects. Neurophysiological biomarkers of spinal and brainstem activity (the RIII flexion reflex, the N13 component of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and the R2 component of the blink reflex) will be recorded before and at three distinct time points after administration of three medications known to act on the nociceptive system (lacosamide, pregabalin, tapentadol), and placebo, given as a single oral dose in separate study periods. Medication effects on neurophysiological measures will be assessed in a clinically relevant hyperalgesic condition (high-frequency electrical stimulation of the skin), and in a non-sensitized normal condition. Patient-reported outcome measures (pain ratings and predictive psychological traits) will also be collected; and blood samples will be taken for pharmacokinetic modelling. A sequentially rejective multiple testing approach will be used with overall alpha error of the primary analysis split between the two primary endpoints, namely the percentage amplitude changes of the RIII area and N13 amplitude under tapentadol. Remaining treatment arm effects on RIII, N13 and R2 recovery cycle are key secondary confirmatory analyses. Complex statistical analyses and PK-PD modelling are exploratory. DISCUSSION: The RIII component of the flexion reflex is a pure nociceptive spinal reflex widely used for investigating pain processing at the spinal level. It is sensitive to different experimental pain models and to the antinociceptive activity of drugs. The N13 is mediated by large myelinated non-nociceptive fibers and reflects segmental postsynaptic response of wide dynamic range dorsal horn neurons at the level of cervical spinal cord, and it could be therefore sensitive to the action of drugs specifically targeting the dorsal horn. The R2 reflex is mediated by large myelinated non-nociceptive fibers, its circuit consists of a polysynaptic chain lying in the reticular formation of the pons and medulla. The recovery cycle of R2 is widely used for assessing brainstem excitability. For these reasons, IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT2 hypothesizes that spinal and brainstem neurophysiological measures can serve as biomarkers of target engagement of analgesic drugs for future Phase 1 clinical trials. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials could also benefit from these tools for patient stratification.

trial registrationThis trial was registered on 02 February 2019 in EudraCT ( 2019-000755-14 ).

Indexed as

AnalgesicsPainSpinal CordBiomarkersBrain StemCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodHealthy VolunteersHumansLacosamideMulticenter Studies as TopicPregabalinRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTapentadolAnalgesicsBiomarkersLacosamidePregabalinTapentadolAnalgesicsBiomarkersHealthy subjectsHyperalgesiaN13 somatosensory evoked potentialsPainPK/PDRCTRIII flexion reflexSpinal cord

Identifiers

PMID36064434
PMCPMC9442941
OpenAlexW4294578987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.