Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064395›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2022

Considering health literacy in cardiovascular disease management: a qualitative study on healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives.

Adèle Perrin, Eléonore Damiolini, Anne-Marie Schott, Jéremy Zermati, Estelle Bravant, François Delahaye, Alexandra L Dima, Julie Haesebaert

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03949309 (Pilot Study of ILIADE), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03949309 completednot on this map

Pilot Study of ILIADE: Exploring Health Literacy Within Patients Hospitalized for Acute Cardiovascular Events

TypeobservationalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2019 to 2019Enrolled209ConditionsAcute Myocardial Infarction, Chronic Heart FailureArmsExploring health literacy levels and patients' informal needs or individual relationship between caregivers and patients.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adèle PerrinResearch on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Eléonore DamioliniResearch on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Anne-Marie SchottResearch on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Jéremy ZermatiResearch on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Estelle BravantResearch on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
François DelahayeResearch on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Alexandra L DimaResearch on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Julie HaesebaertResearch on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France. julie.haesebaert@chu-lyon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9109-5604

Funding

Programme de Recherche sur la Performance du Système Hospitalier PREPS-18-0697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementing practices adapted to patient health literacy (HL) is a promising avenue for improving their outcomes in the context of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). The health communication skills of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and the quality of information provided are essential for low-HL patients. We aimed to explore HCP knowledge about HL, patients' and HCPs' views on current practices regarding low-HL patients, and facilitators and barriers to adapting communication to patients' HL level, in order to prepare the implementation of a complex intervention dedicated to improve CVD management for low-HL patients.

methodsWe conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with HCPs practicing in cardiology units and patients hospitalized for CVD. The study design and analysis were based on the Theory of Planned Behavior for HCPs and on the framework of Health Literacy and Health Action for patients. Deductive and inductive thematic analysis were used. Barriers and facilitators were structured into an Ishikawa fishbone diagram and implementation strategies were selected to address resulting themes from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC).

resultsFifteen patients and 14 HCPs were interviewed. HCPs had partial knowledge of HL dimensions. Perceptions of HCPs and patients were not congruent regarding HCP-patient interactions and information provided by hospital and community HCPs. HCPs perceived they lacked validated tools and skills, and declared they adapted spontaneously their communication when interacting with low-HL patients. Patients expressed unmet needs regarding communication during hospital discharge and at return to home.

conclusionTo implement HL-tailored practices in this setting, our results suggest that several implementation strategies will be valuable at individual (engaging patients and their family), interactional (educating and training of HCPs about HL), and organizational levels (creating a multidisciplinary HCP interest group dedicated to HL).

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, (NCT number) NCT03949309, May 10, 2019.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHealth CommunicationHealth LiteracyAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansQualitative ResearchCommunicationHealth literacyImplementationQualitative studyTailored strategy

Identifiers

PMID36064395
PMCPMC9446730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.