Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36064370›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2022

Safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with nephrotic syndrome: a report of 21 cases.

Sarah Kelddal, Anne-Mette Hvas, Erik Lerkevang Grove, Henrik Birn

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Standard Anticoagulation for Thromboprophylaxis in Nephrotic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Renal Vein Thrombosis: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Membranous Nephropathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Thromboembolism in nephrotic syndrome: controversies and uncertainties.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah KelddalDepartment of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. sarah.kelddal@midt.rm.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-8873-0814
Anne-Mette HvasFaculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Erik Lerkevang GroveDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Health, Aarhus, Denmark.
Henrik BirnDepartment of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNephrotic syndrome (NS) is associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events (TE) adding to the morbidity and mortality. International guidelines recommend prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with NS and high risk of TE, but no studies have identified the optimal type of anticoagulation in NS. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) by analyzing the thromboembolic and bleeding events in NS patients prescribed DOAC as primary prophylaxis to prevent TE or as treatment for TE occurring in relation to NS.

methodsWe performed a single-center, retrospective study including patients with NS, a plasma albumin less than 25 g/L and prophylactic anticoagulation treatment with DOAC at the Department of Renal Medicine at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark from July 2016 to June 2021. Patients treated with DOAC as thromboprophylaxis for other indications than NS were excluded. Baseline characteristics and outcomes, including TE, bleeding and other adverse effects associated with DOAC were obtained from medical records.

resultsWe identified 268 patients treated with DOAC of which 21 patients with NS were included in the study. Nineteen patients were prescribed DOAC as thromboprophylaxis and two patients received DOAC due to previous TE, which was considered associated with the NS. The type of DOAC prescribed was apixaban (n = 10) and rivaroxaban (n = 11). No patients experienced TE during DOAC treatment, while five patients had a minor bleeding episode. Patients who experienced bleeding episodes were older (median 62 vs 51 years), more often female (80%) and had been on DOAC for a longer period (204 days vs 47 days). Neither the HAS-BLED score nor GN-risk-score predicted the risk of minor bleedings in this population.

conclusionsIn this case series, no new TE and only minor bleeding complications were observed among adult NS patients treated with DOAC.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationNephrotic SyndromeVenous ThromboembolismAdministration, OralAdultAnticoagulantsFemaleHemorrhageHumansRetrospective StudiesAnticoagulantsDirect oral anticoagulantsGlomerulonephritisHypoalbuminemiaNephrotic syndromeProphylactic anticoagulationProteinuriaThromboembolic events

Identifiers

PMID36064370
PMCPMC9446569
OpenAlexW4294689838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.